Paper · 2014 · Pest Management Science

Effect of specific plant‐growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on growth and uptake of neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam in corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings

Charalampos K Myresiotis; Zisis Vryzas; Euphemia Papadopoulou‐Mourkidou

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Corn (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important cereal crops in the world and is used for food, feed and energy. Inoculation with plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) would reduce the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides and could be suggested as an alternative practice for sustainable production of corn in modern agricultural systems. In this study, the effect of two Bacillus PGPR formulated products, Companion (B. subtilis GB03) and FZB24 (B. subtilis FZB24), on corn growth and root uptake of insecticide thiamethoxam was investigated. RESULTS: All bacterial treatments enhanced root biomass production by 38-65% compared with the uninoculated control, with no stimulatory effect of PGPR on above-ground biomass of corn. The uptake results revealed that, in plants inoculated with the PGPR B. subtilis FZB24 and B. subtilis GB03, singly or in combination, the uptake and/or systemic translocation of thiamethoxam in the above-ground corn parts was significantly higher at the different growth ages compared with the control receiving no bacterial treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the PGPR-elicited enhanced uptake of thiamethoxam could lead to improved efficiency of thiamethoxam using reduced rates of pesticides in combination with PGPR as an alternative crop protection technique.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatments increased root biomass by 38-65% versus uninoculated controls.

Treatment
bacterial treatmentse0
Interactor
bacterial treatmentse0symbiontt1
Outcome
root biomass productione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
38-65%e0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All bacterial treatments enhanced root biomass production by 38-65% compared with the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR did not stimulate above-ground corn biomass.

Treatment
PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiontt1
Outcome
above-ground biomass of corne0
Direction
no stimulatory effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no stimulatory effect of PGPR on above-ground biomass of corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis FZB24 inoculation significantly increased thiamethoxam uptake or translocation in above-ground corn parts.

Treatment
inoculated with the PGPR B. subtilis FZB24e0
Interactor
B. subtilis FZB24Bacillus subtilise0symbiontt1
Outcome
uptake and/or systemic translocation of thiamethoxam in the above-ground corn partse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control receiving no bacterial treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in plants inoculated with the PGPR B. subtilis FZB24 and B. subtilis GB03, singly or in combination, the uptake and/or systemic translocation of thiamethoxam in the above-ground corn parts was significantly higher at the different growth ages compared with the control receiving no bacterial treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis GB03 inoculation significantly increased thiamethoxam uptake or translocation in above-ground corn parts.

Treatment
B. subtilis GB03e0
Interactor
B. subtilis GB03Bacillus subtilise0symbiontt1
Outcome
uptake and/or systemic translocation of thiamethoxam in the above-ground corn partse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control receiving no bacterial treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in plants inoculated with the PGPR B. subtilis FZB24 and B. subtilis GB03, singly or in combination, the uptake and/or systemic translocation of thiamethoxam in the above-ground corn parts was significantly higher at the different growth ages compared with the control receiving no bacterial treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation significantly increased thiamethoxam uptake or translocation in above-ground corn parts.

Treatment
B. subtilis FZB24 and B. subtilis GB03, singly or in combinatione0
Interactor
B. subtilis FZB24Bacillus subtilise0symbiontt1
Second interactor
B. subtilis GB03Bacillus subtilise0symbiontt1
Outcome
uptake and/or systemic translocation of thiamethoxam in the above-ground corn partse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control receiving no bacterial treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in plants inoculated with the PGPR B. subtilis FZB24 and B. subtilis GB03, singly or in combination, the uptake and/or systemic translocation of thiamethoxam in the above-ground corn parts was significantly higher at the different growth ages compared with the control receiving no bacterial treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest PGPR may improve thiamethoxam efficiency at reduced pesticide rates.

Interactor
PGPRe0symbiontt1
Outcome
improved efficiency of thiamethoxam using reduced rates of pesticides in combination with PGPRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings suggest that the PGPR-elicited enhanced uptake of thiamethoxam could lead to improved efficiency of thiamethoxam using reduced rates of pesticides in combination with PGPR as an alternative crop protection technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–157 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.