Abstract
Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the straw production and the agronomic performance of soybean intercropped with oversown forage species, in no-tillage system. A randomized complete block design was carried out with four replicates, in a 5×2+2 factorial arrangement, as follows: five forage species - Urochloa brizantha 'Marandu', Urochloa ruziziensis, Panicum maximum 'Mombaça', Panicum maximum 'Massai', and Pennisetum americanum -, intercropped with soybean over two crop years (2013/2014 and 2014/2015), plus two controls, with P. americanum sowed in succession to soybean or with soybean monocropping followed by winter fallow (traditional cultivation). Soybean yield components and forage straw yield were evaluated. None of the intercropping systems reduced soybean grain yield, compared with monocropped soybean. The oversown species can significantly improve soybean productivity, as is the case for soybean intercropped with P.maximum 'Mombaça', compared with soybean monocropping, followed or not by millet. Panicum maximum 'Mombaça' is the most effective forage species for dry matter accumulation in the fall/spring period.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
None of the intercropping systems reduced soybean grain yield compared with monocropped soybean.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- intercropping systemse1
- Outcome
- soybean grain yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Qualifier
- None of the intercropping systems reducede1
- Comparator
- monocropped soybeane1
- Setting
- no-tillage systemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Straw production and agronomic performance of soybean intercropped with forage species in no-tillage system”
e1“None of the intercropping systems reduced soybean grain yield, compared with monocropped soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean intercropped with Panicum maximum Mombaça significantly improved soybean productivity compared with soybean monoculture.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- soybean intercropped with P.maximum 'Mombaça'e1
- Outcome
- soybean productivitye1
- Direction
- improvee1
- Comparator
- soybean monocroppinge1
- Setting
- no-tillage systemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Straw production and agronomic performance of soybean intercropped with forage species in no-tillage system”
e1“The oversown species can significantly improve soybean productivity, as is the case for soybean intercropped with P.maximum 'Mombaça', compared with soybean monocropping, followed or not by millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Panicum maximum Mombaça was the most effective forage species for dry matter accumulation in the fall/spring period.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Panicum maximum 'Mombaça'e1
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation in the fall/spring periode1
- Direction
- most effectivee1
- Setting
- no-tillage systemt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Straw production and agronomic performance of soybean intercropped with forage species in no-tillage system”
e1“Panicum maximum 'Mombaça' is the most effective forage species for dry matter accumulation in the fall/spring period”
The same questions in other papers
Megathyrsus maximus · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- negative
214 papers more in this group
See all 218 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.