Abstract
Sequential or complementary herbicide applications were particularly effective for providing season-long weed control in sugarbeets (95 to 98%). The benefit of herbicides over the hand weeded check ranged from a low of $191A with layby treatments to a high of $1471A with complementary preplant incorpo ratedlpostemergence applications of cycloate plus ethofumesate followed by postemergence applica tions of desm~dipham plus phenmedipham. The be nefit of preplant incorporated herbicides over the handweeded check exceeded $1201A whether applied alone or as a complementary treatment. This data suggests that under heavy weed pressure preplant incorporated herbicide treatments are essential to minimize weed control costs in sugarbeets. Regression analysis of hoeing time as a function of weed population indicated that 2.8 hrlA/trip was required to walk a sugarbeet field without weeds and that an additional 0.3 hrlA/trip was required for every 1000 weedslA. This information should pro vide growers and laborers some basis for price negoti ations. Additional
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential or complementary herbicides achieved 95 to 98% season-long weed control.
- Taxon
- sugarbeets
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Sequential or complementary herbicide applicationse0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- season-long weed controle0
- Direction
- particularly effectivee0
- Value
- 95 to 98%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarbeets”
e0“Sequential or complementary herbicide applications were particularly effective for providing season-long weed control in sugarbeets (95 to 98%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Layby treatments yielded the lowest herbicide benefit, $191A, versus hand weeding.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- layby treatmentse0
- Outcome
- benefit of herbicidese0
- Direction
- lowe0
- Value
- $191Ae0
- Comparator
- hand weeded checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarbeets”
e0“The benefit of herbicides over the hand weeded check ranged from a low of $191A with layby treatments to a high of $1471A with complementary preplant incorpo ratedlpostemergence applications of cycloate plus ethofumesate followed by postemergence applica tions of desm~dipham plus phenmedipham.”
Claim · model-written summary
The specified complementary preplant and postemergence program yielded the highest benefit, $1471A, versus hand weeding.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- complementary preplant incorpo ratedlpostemergence applications of cycloate plus ethofumesate followed by postemergence applica tions of desm~dipham plus phenmediphame0
- Outcome
- benefit of herbicidese0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- $1471Ae0
- Comparator
- hand weeded checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarbeets”
e0“The benefit of herbicides over the hand weeded check ranged from a low of $191A with layby treatments to a high of $1471A with complementary preplant incorpo ratedlpostemergence applications of cycloate plus ethofumesate followed by postemergence applica tions of desm~dipham plus phenmedipham.”
Claim · model-written summary
Preplant incorporated herbicides exceeded $1201A in benefit versus hand weeding, alone or complementary.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- preplant incorporated herbicidese0
- Outcome
- benefite0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Value
- $1201Ae0
- Comparator
- handweeded checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarbeets”
e0“The be nefit of preplant incorporated herbicides over the handweeded check exceeded $1201A whether applied alone or as a complementary treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend preplant incorporated herbicides under heavy weed pressure to minimize weed-control costs.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- preplant incorporated herbicide treatments are essential to minimize weed control costse0
- Qualifier
- under heavy weed pressuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarbeets”
e0“This data suggests that under heavy weed pressure preplant incorporated herbicide treatments are essential to minimize weed control costs in sugarbeets.”
Claim · model-written summary
Walking a sugarbeet field without weeds required 2.8 hrlA/trip.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- walk a sugarbeet field without weedse0
- Value
- 2.8 hrlA/tripe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarbeets”
e0“2.8 hrlA/trip was required to walk a sugarbeet field without weeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Every 1000 weedslA required an additional 0.3 hrlA/trip of hoeing time.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- 0.3 hrlA/tripe0
- Direction
- additionale0
- Value
- 0.3 hrlA/tripe0
- Qualifier
- every 1000 weedslAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarbeets”
e0“an additional 0.3 hrlA/trip was required for every 1000 weedslA”
The same questions in other papers
phenmedipham · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
ethofumesate · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →herbicide · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.