Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium, sodium and alpha amino nitrogen contents in sugar beet roots did not significantly depend on weed control method.

A claim from Impact of non-chemical weed control methods on the soil and sugar beet root chemical composition · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium, sodium and alpha amino nitrogen contents in sugar beet roots did not significantly depend on weed control method.

Organ / stage
rootse7
Treatment
methods of weed controle7
Outcome
content of potassium, sodium and alpha amino nitrogen in the rootse7
Direction
did not significantly depende7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Impact of non-chemical weed control methods on the soil and sugar beet root chemical composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96
e7

“The content of potassium, sodium and alpha amino nitrogen in the roots did not significantly depend on the methods of weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1933

Title

Impact of non-chemical weed control methods on the soil and sugar beet root chemical composition

Marek Marks; Marek Marks; Kęstutis Romaneckas; et al. Journal of Elementology 2018. doi:10.5601/jelem.2017.22.4.1509

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c544ecc5cd58f8ff8d8d45ac4c55883cfc0ca09ca1eb30c6a0199ceab57ad19c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.