Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Leaf Colour Chart for Proficient Nitrogen Management in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

Sheikh Amir Ali; S. Elamathi; Suryendra Singh; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2009 at the Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India to study the effect of different spilt doses of nitrogen (N), Leaf Colour Chart (LCC) based nitrogen management on growth and yield of transplanted rice. Nitrogen management practices were consisted of application of 150 kg N ha-1 in different split doses (Two equal splits – 1/2 at basal, 1/2 at active tillering, Three splits – 1/2 at basal, 1/4 at active tillering, 1/4 at panicle initiation, Three splits 1/3 at basal, 1/3 at active tillering, 1/3 at panicle initiation, Four splits – 1/4 at basal, 1/4 at active tillering, 1/4 at maximum tillering, 1/4 at panicle initiation, and Four splits – 1/3 at basal, 1/3 at active tillering, 1/6 at maximum tillering, 1/6 at panicle initiation), LCC 3 and LCC 4 with 20 kg N ha-1 as basal with 23 and 28 kg N ha-1 respectively based on weekly reading. The results revealed that nitrogen management at LCC value of 4 (4 splits; 132 kg N ha-1) produced significantly higher plant height (113.4 cm), crop and relative growth rates 21.84 g m-2 day-1 and 0.072 g g-1 day-1 respectively, effective tillers hill-1 (14.60), grains panicle-1 (162.13) and grain yield (60.70 q ha-1) than LCC value of 3 (4 splits; 112 kg N ha-1) that produced grain yield of (42.30 q ha-1) as well as other nitrogen management treatments (N at 150 kg ha-1). Thus, considering the influence of LCC based nitrogen application on productivity and profitability of rice and saving of fertilizer N. It is concluded that the LCC offers gigantic opportunities to increase N use efficiency, rice yield and net return for farmers in Allahabad region of Eastern Uttar Pradesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 4 nitrogen management increased plant height compared with LCC 3 and other nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
nitrogen management at LCC value of 4 (4 splits; 132 kg N ha-1)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
113.4 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen management at LCC value of 4 (4 splits; 132 kg N ha-1) produced significantly higher plant height (113.4 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 4 increased crop growth rate.

Outcome
crop and relative growth ratese0
Value
21.84 g m-2 day-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop and relative growth rates 21.84 g m-2 day-1 and 0.072 g g-1 day-1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 4 increased relative growth rate.

Outcome
relative growth ratese0
Value
0.072 g g-1 day-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative growth rates 21.84 g m-2 day-1 and 0.072 g g-1 day-1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 4 produced 14.60 effective tillers per hill.

Outcome
effective tillers hill-1e0
Value
14.60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective tillers hill-1 (14.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 4 produced 162.13 grains per panicle.

Outcome
grains panicle-1e0
Value
162.13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains panicle-1 (162.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 4 produced higher grain yield than LCC 3 and other treatments, at 60.70 q ha-1 versus 42.30 q ha-1 for LCC 3.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
60.70 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
42.30 q ha-1e0
Comparator
LCC value of 3 (4 splits; 112 kg N ha-1)e0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (60.70 q ha-1) than LCC value of 3 (4 splits; 112 kg N ha-1) that produced grain yield of (42.30 q ha-1) as well as other nitrogen management treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that LCC management can increase nitrogen use efficiency, rice yield and farmer net return.

Outcome
N use efficiency, rice yield and net returne0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
Allahabad region of Eastern Uttar Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LCC offers gigantic opportunities to increase N use efficiency, rice yield and net return for farmers in Allahabad region of Eastern Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1816 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.