Paper · 2017 · Journal of Ornamental Horticulture

Determination of total phenolics and antioxidant content in lily bulb extracts

M. R. Dhiman; Chander Parkash; Sindhu Sareen; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lilies are among the most economically important and widely cultivated floricultural crops worldwide have great ornamental, medicinal and edible value. Bulbs of four Lilium species (L. regale, L. lancifolium, L. longiflorum, Lilium sp.), and five cultivars of different hybrid groups (namely Avocado, Tiara, Navona and Brunello were investigated with a view to their exploitation as a potential source of natural antioxidants due to their phenolic composition and dietary antioxidant potential. Significant differences exists in the antioxidant capacity as well as in the total phenolic content of bulb extracts assayed via the FRAP (μ mol/g) and CUPRAC (μ mol/g) methods. Lilium regale had the highest phenolic content and the strongest antioxidant capacity followed by cultivar Mother Choice, while Lilium lancifolium and cultivar Navona had the lowest phenolic contents and the weakest antioxidant activity among the tested species and cultivars. The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation of total phenols with FRAP (0.957**), CUPRAC (0.923**) and FRAP with CUPRAC (0.930**). Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that L. regale belonged to the group with high phenolic content and strong antioxidant power. The results indicate that lily bulbs are the good candidates for further development as nutraceutical supplements or antioxidants remedies. Further studies should focus on the assessments of these extracts before their commercial exploitation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb extracts differed significantly in antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content.

Taxon
lilyLiliumt0
Organ / stage
bulbe0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity as well as in the total phenolic contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences exists in the antioxidant capacity as well as in the total phenolic content of bulb extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“lily bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lilium regale had the highest phenolic content and strongest antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
Lilium regaleLilium regalee0
Outcome
phenolic content and the strongest antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium regale
Lilium regale · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lilium regale had the highest phenolic content and the strongest antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Mother Choice followed Lilium regale for phenolic content and antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
LiliumLiliume1
Material
Mother Choicee0
Outcome
phenolic content and the strongest antioxidant capacitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by cultivar Mother Choice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lilium regale had the highest phenolic content and the strongest antioxidant capacity followed by cultivar Mother Choice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lilium lancifolium had the lowest phenolic content and weakest antioxidant activity.

Taxon
Lilium lancifoliumLilium lancifoliume0
Outcome
phenolic contents and the weakest antioxidant activitye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium lancifolium
Lilium lancifolium · TaxonAndrew Van Houten. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lilium lancifolium and cultivar Navona had the lowest phenolic contents and the weakest antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Navona had the lowest phenolic content and weakest antioxidant activity.

Taxon
LiliumLiliume0
Material
Navonae0
Outcome
phenolic contents and the weakest antioxidant activitye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lilium lancifolium and cultivar Navona had the lowest phenolic contents and the weakest antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenols correlated positively with FRAP (0.957**).

Taxon
lilyLiliumt0
Outcome
FRAPe0
Direction
positivee0
Value
0.957**e0
Comparator
total phenolse0

Not reportedCompound

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive correlation of total phenols with FRAP (0.957**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“lily bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenols correlated positively with CUPRAC (0.923**).

Taxon
lilyLiliumt0
Outcome
CUPRACe0
Direction
positivee0
Value
0.923**e0
Comparator
total phenolse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive correlation of total phenols with FRAP (0.957**), CUPRAC (0.923**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“lily bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FRAP and CUPRAC correlated positively (0.930**).

Taxon
lilyLiliumt0
Outcome
CUPRACe0
Direction
positivee1
Value
0.930**e0
Comparator
FRAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FRAP with CUPRAC (0.930**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant positive correlation of total phenols with FRAP (0.957**), CUPRAC (0.923**) and FRAP with CUPRAC (0.930**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“lily bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hierarchical clustering placed L. regale in the high phenolic content and strong antioxidant power group.

Taxon
L. regaleLilium regalee0
Outcome
high phenolic content and strong antioxidant powere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium regale
Lilium regale · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L. regale belonged to the group with high phenolic content and strong antioxidant power”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1223 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify lily bulbs as candidates for nutraceutical or antioxidant development.

Taxon
lilyLiliume0
Outcome
further development as nutraceutical supplements or antioxidants remediese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lily bulbs are the good candidates for further development as nutraceutical supplements or antioxidants remedies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1363 · show in text ↑