Paper · 2017

How does the resistance to Fusarium head blight effect the deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat

Bojan Šarkanj; Ivan Abičić; Valentina Španić

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a wheat disease that affects numerous wheat cultivating regions, including Croatia, reducing the safety and the quality of the wheat and wheat-derived food. The most occurring mycotoxin produced by Fusarium spp. is deoxynivalenol (DON), the immunotoxic mycotoxin, harmful to humans and animals. Its concentration is regulated in raw cereals, food, and feed, therefore it is important to control the wheat infection to be able to use the cereals in food and feed industry. The aim of this work was to compare the resistance to FHB of winter wheat varieties grown in Croatia by carrying out research at the field by using natural contamination without fungicide protection as a control and inoculation treatment with a mixture of Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum as high contamination scenario. Total 25 varieties were tested and divided into four subgroups according to their declared resistance: resistant (R), moderately resistant (MR), moderately susceptible (MS) and susceptible (S). The resistant varieties had the best resistance to high contamination with F. culmorum and F. graminaerum (median DON concentration 328 µg kg-1), and natural contamination (median DON concentration 50.0 µg kg-1). And on average the varieties did show resistance to FHB, and DON accumulation, but there were several exceptions. In the high contamination scenario, the highest sensitivity was detected in S variety with maximum DON concentration of 6663 µg kg-1, and the most susceptible in control group was variety declared as MR with maximum DON concentration of 580 µg kg-1. The research has proven that there is a need for further research and harmonization of declaration for the susceptibility of the varieties to FHB and DON accumulation to ensure further food and feed safety and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant varieties under high Fusarium contamination had the best resistance, with median DON 328 µg kg-1

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
resistant varietiese1
Treatment
high contamination with F. culmorum and F. graminaerume1
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume1pathogen
Second interactor
F. graminaerume1pathogen
Outcome
median DON concentratione1
Direction
best resistancee1
Value
328 µg kg-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this work was to compare the resistance to FHB of winter wheat varieties grown in Croatia by carrying out research at the field by using natural contamination without fungicide protection as a control and inoculation treatment with a mixture of Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum as high contamination scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“The resistant varieties had the best resistance to high contamination with F. culmorum and F. graminaerum (median DON concentration 328 µg kg-1), and natural contamination (median DON concentration 50.0 µg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant varieties under natural contamination had the best resistance, with median DON 50.0 µg kg-1

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
resistant varietiese1
Treatment
natural contaminatione1
Outcome
median DON concentratione1
Direction
best resistancee1
Value
50.0 µg kg-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this work was to compare the resistance to FHB of winter wheat varieties grown in Croatia by carrying out research at the field by using natural contamination without fungicide protection as a control and inoculation treatment with a mixture of Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum as high contamination scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“The resistant varieties had the best resistance to high contamination with F. culmorum and F. graminaerum (median DON concentration 328 µg kg-1), and natural contamination (median DON concentration 50.0 µg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high contamination, variety S had the highest DON accumulation (6663 µg kg-1)

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
S varietye2
Treatment
high contamination scenarioe2
Outcome
maximum DON concentratione2
Direction
highest sensitivitye2
Value
6663 µg kg-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this work was to compare the resistance to FHB of winter wheat varieties grown in Croatia by carrying out research at the field by using natural contamination without fungicide protection as a control and inoculation treatment with a mixture of Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum as high contamination scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–825 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the high contamination scenario, the highest sensitivity was detected in S variety with maximum DON concentration of 6663 µg kg-1, and the most susceptible in control group was variety declared as MR with maximum DON concentration of 580 µg kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the control group, the variety declared MR had the maximum DON concentration (580 µg kg-1)

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
variety declared as MRe2
Treatment
control groupe2
Outcome
maximum DON concentratione2
Direction
most susceptiblee2
Value
580 µg kg-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this work was to compare the resistance to FHB of winter wheat varieties grown in Croatia by carrying out research at the field by using natural contamination without fungicide protection as a control and inoculation treatment with a mixture of Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum as high contamination scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–825 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the high contamination scenario, the highest sensitivity was detected in S variety with maximum DON concentration of 6663 µg kg-1, and the most susceptible in control group was variety declared as MR with maximum DON concentration of 580 µg kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1596 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average the wheat varieties showed resistance to FHB and DON accumulation, with several exceptions

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
resistance to FHB, and DON accumulatione3
Qualifier
there were several exceptionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this work was to compare the resistance to FHB of winter wheat varieties grown in Croatia by carrying out research at the field by using natural contamination without fungicide protection as a control and inoculation treatment with a mixture of Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum as high contamination scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–825 · show in text ↑
e3

“on average the varieties did show resistance to FHB, and DON accumulation, but there were several exceptions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1346 · show in text ↑

Fusarium culmorum · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.