Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Sugarcane Field Residue and Root Allelopathic Impact on Weed Seed Germination

Charles L. Webber III; Paul M. White Jr; Derek S. Landrum; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Allelopathy, the chemical interaction between plants, may result in the inhibition of plant growth and development, which can include compounds released from a crop that adversely impact weed species. The objective of this research was to determine the allelopathic impact of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) field residue and root water extracts on seed germination of three weed species. Red morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and spiny amaranth (Amaranthus spinosus L.)] seeds were treated with five extract concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 g/L) from either sugarcane field residue or sugarcane root extracts. The field residue and roots were from sugarcane variety ‘HoCP 96-540’ plant cane. Germination generally decreased with increasing sugarcane field residue extract concentrations in the three weed species tested. At the highest residue concentration (100 g/L), red morningglory, redroot pigweed, and spiny amaranth germination decreased by 29%, 17.5% and 80.5%, respectively. Germination generally decreased with increasing sugarcane root extract concentrations in red morningglory and redroot pigweed, but not with spiny amaranth. The highest root concentration (100 g/L) decreased red morningglory and redroot pigweed germination by 19.5% and 18.5%, respectively. This research provides the first bioassay demonstrating that sugarcane root extracts have allelopathic activity, and specifically in respect to red morningglory and redroot pigweed germination. Future research should investigate the allelopathic compounds present in the sugarcane field residue and roots, determine if the same allelopathic compounds are present and in similar concentrations among other sugarcane varieties, and further examine which weed species may be susceptible to the allelopathic compounds present in sugarcane roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination of the three weed species decreased with increasing sugarcane field residue extract concentrations.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugarcane field residue extracte1
Interactor
weed speciese1weed
Outcome
Germinatione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Germination generally decreased with increasing sugarcane field residue extract concentrations in the three weed species tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Field Residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 g/L, sugarcane field residue extract decreased red morningglory germination by 29%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
highest residue concentration (100 g/L)e2
Interactor
red morninggloryIpomoea coccineae2weed
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
29%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea coccinea
Ipomoea coccinea · InteractorMichael Wolf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“At the highest residue concentration (100 g/L), red morningglory, redroot pigweed, and spiny amaranth germination decreased by 29%, 17.5% and 80.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Field Residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 g/L, sugarcane field residue extract decreased redroot pigweed germination by 17.5%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
highest residue concentration (100 g/L)e2
Interactor
redroot pigweede2weed
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
17.5%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“At the highest residue concentration (100 g/L), red morningglory, redroot pigweed, and spiny amaranth germination decreased by 29%, 17.5% and 80.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Field Residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 g/L, sugarcane field residue extract decreased spiny amaranth germination by 80.5%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
highest residue concentration (100 g/L)e2
Interactor
spiny amaranthe2weed
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
80.5%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“At the highest residue concentration (100 g/L), red morningglory, redroot pigweed, and spiny amaranth germination decreased by 29%, 17.5% and 80.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Field Residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination decreased with increasing sugarcane root extract concentrations in red morningglory and redroot pigweed, but not in spiny amaranth.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugarcane root extracte3
Interactor
red morninggloryIpomoea coccineae3weed
Second interactor
redroot pigweede3weed
Outcome
Germinatione3
Direction
decreasede3
Qualifier
but not with spiny amaranthe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea coccinea
Ipomoea coccinea · InteractorMichael Wolf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Germination generally decreased with increasing sugarcane root extract concentrations in red morningglory and redroot pigweed, but not with spiny amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Field Residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sugarcane root extract concentration (100 g/L) decreased red morningglory germination by 19.5%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
highest root concentration (100 g/L)e4
Interactor
red morninggloryIpomoea coccineae4weed
Outcome
germinatione4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
19.5%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea coccinea
Ipomoea coccinea · InteractorMichael Wolf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest root concentration (100 g/L) decreased red morningglory and redroot pigweed germination by 19.5% and 18.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Field Residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sugarcane root extract concentration (100 g/L) decreased redroot pigweed germination by 18.5%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
highest root concentration (100 g/L)e4
Interactor
redroot pigweede4weed
Outcome
germinatione4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
18.5%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The highest root concentration (100 g/L) decreased red morningglory and redroot pigweed germination by 19.5% and 18.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Field Residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.