Paper · 2017 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Acid tolerant Rhizobium strains contribute to increasing the yield and profitability of common bean in tropical soils

Dâmiany Pádua Oliveira; Marislaine Alves de Figueiredo; Bruno Lima Soares; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Symbiosis of common bean with nitrogen-fixing bacteria can lead to a reduction in production costs and in environmental impacts.Considering the diversity of soils and climates, it is important to validate bacterial strains under different conditions to consolidate their recommendation as inoculants.Studies concerning the economic viability of Rhizobium inoculation in common bean are few, but they could assist in choosing the strain to be adopted.The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of Rhizobium strains isolated from acid soils from the Amazon inoculated in seeds of the 'BRSMG Madrepérola' cultivar and to evaluate the economic viability of their use in the field.Four field experiments were conducted in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.A randomized block experimental design was used with four replications and seven treatments: inoculation with the strains CIAT 899 (Rhizobium tropici), UFLA 02-100 (R. etli), UFLA 02-68 (R. etli bv.mimosae), UFLA 02-127 (R. leguminosarum bv.phaseoli), and UFLA 04-173 (R. miluonense), plus two controls, one without inoculation + mineral nitrogen (N-urea) at a rate of 80 kg N ha -1 and another without inoculation and without mineral N. The strain CIAT 899 is already recommended for the manufacture of commercial inoculants, and the others, collected in the Amazon region, have proven to be highly effective in biological nitrogen fixation.Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluated leads to satisfactory yields, with reduction in the application rate of mineral nitrogen and in environmental impacts and, consequently, reduction in economic costs, with higher profitability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with the evaluated Rhizobium strains leads to satisfactory yields of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise4
Material
BRSMG Madrepérolae1
Treatment
inoculation with the strainse3
Interactor
Rhizobium strainst0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
satisfactorye4
Comparator
without inoculation and without mineral Ne3
Setting
Minas Gerais, Brazile2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acid tolerant Rhizobium strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of Rhizobium strains isolated from acid soils from the Amazon inoculated in seeds of the 'BRSMG Madrepérola' cultivar and to evaluate the economic viability of their use in the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–687 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four field experiments were conducted in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–762 · show in text ↑
e3

“A randomized block experimental design was used with four replications and seven treatments: inoculation with the strains CIAT 899 (Rhizobium tropici), UFLA 02-100 (R. etli), UFLA 02-68 (R. etli bv.mimosae), UFLA 02-127 (R. leguminosarum bv.phaseoli), and UFLA 04-173 (R. miluonense), plus two controls, one without inoculation + mineral nitrogen (N-urea) at a rate of 80 kg N ha -1 and another without inoculation and without mineral N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–1199 · show in text ↑
e4

“Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluated leads to satisfactory yields, with reduction in the application rate of mineral nitrogen and in environmental impacts and, consequently, reduction in economic costs, with higher profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiosis with the evaluated strains reduces the application rate of mineral nitrogen in common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise4
Treatment
Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluatede4
Outcome
application rate of mineral nitrogene4
Direction
reductione4

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluated leads to satisfactory yields, with reduction in the application rate of mineral nitrogen and in environmental impacts and, consequently, reduction in economic costs, with higher profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiosis with the evaluated strains reduces environmental impacts of common bean production.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise4
Treatment
Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluatede4
Outcome
environmental impactse4
Direction
reductione4

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluated leads to satisfactory yields, with reduction in the application rate of mineral nitrogen and in environmental impacts and, consequently, reduction in economic costs, with higher profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiosis with the evaluated strains reduces economic costs of common bean production.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise4
Treatment
Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluatede4
Outcome
economic costse4
Direction
reductione4

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluated leads to satisfactory yields, with reduction in the application rate of mineral nitrogen and in environmental impacts and, consequently, reduction in economic costs, with higher profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiosis with the evaluated strains gives higher profitability for common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise4
Treatment
Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluatede4
Outcome
profitabilitye4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Symbiosis of common bean with all the strains evaluated leads to satisfactory yields, with reduction in the application rate of mineral nitrogen and in environmental impacts and, consequently, reduction in economic costs, with higher profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1652 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.