Paper · 2017 · Ecological Questions

Spatio-temporal variability of Gladiolus imbricatus L. populations in different plant communities near Kraków

Kinga Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The investigations, aimed to assess the abundance, stage structure and distribution of shoots, as well as the chosen traits of generative shoots (number of leaves and length of the longest one, height of shoot, length of inflorescence and the dorsal tepal of the lowermost flower, number of seed capsules) of Gladiolus imbricatus L. were conducted in the years 2015–2017. The observations were carried out from Kraków-Pychowice to Tyniec in abandoned moor-grass meadow (Patch I), shrub willows (Patch II), macroforb community (Patch III) and community dominated by tall-growing grasses (Patch IV). The population abundance augmented gradually in subsequent study sites. Additionally, the temporal fluctuations of shoot number were recorded in all the Patches. The similar in consecutive years’ stage structure differs among the study sites. The occurrence of juvenile, vegetative and generative shoots in Patch I might suggest the successful seedling recruitment, while the lack of shoots in pregenerative stages in Patches II-IV might indicate the absence of safe sites for the appearance of new genets. The occurrence of clusters of shoots in Patches II-IV might be a consequence of clonal growth. The traits of generative shoots rather did not show the temporal variability, but they presented spatial variability and in most cases augmented from Patch I, via Patches II and III, to Patch IV.The performed studies enabled ascertaining that the population occurring in Patch I presents the best condition despite the lowest abundance of shoots. Also the other, more abundant populations, inhabiting Patches II-IV might persist in the colonised sites thanks to the vegetative multiplication of ramets and maximisation of chances for successful pollination and effective seed dissemination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population abundance increased across successive sites.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Outcome
population abundancee0
Direction
augmentede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population abundance augmented gradually in subsequent study sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot number fluctuated over time in all patches.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Outcome
temporal fluctuations of shoot numbere0
Setting
all the Patchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the temporal fluctuations of shoot number were recorded in all the Patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stage structure was similar across years but differed among sites.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Outcome
stage structure differs among the study sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The similar in consecutive years’ stage structure differs among the study sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Juvenile, vegetative and generative shoots in Patch I may indicate successful recruitment.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Organ / stage
juvenile, vegetative and generative shootse0
Outcome
successful seedling recruitmente0
Setting
Patch Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The occurrence of juvenile, vegetative and generative shoots in Patch I might suggest the successful seedling recruitment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of pregenerative shoots in Patches II-IV may indicate an absence of safe sites for new genets.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Organ / stage
shoots in pregenerative stagese0
Outcome
absence of safe sites for the appearance of new genetse0
Setting
Patches II-IVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lack of shoots in pregenerative stages in Patches II-IV might indicate the absence of safe sites for the appearance of new genets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot clusters in Patches II-IV may result from clonal growth.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Outcome
clusters of shootse0
Qualifier
clonal growthe0
Setting
Patches II-IVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The occurrence of clusters of shoots in Patches II-IV might be a consequence of clonal growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Generative shoot traits showed little temporal variability.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Organ / stage
generative shootse0
Outcome
temporal variabilitye0
Direction
did not showe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The traits of generative shoots rather did not show the temporal variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Generative shoot traits varied spatially and mostly increased from Patch I to IV.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Outcome
spatial variabilitye0
Direction
augmentede0
Setting
Patch I, via Patches II and III, to Patch IVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they presented spatial variability and in most cases augmented from Patch I, via Patches II and III, to Patch IV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Patch I had the best population condition despite lowest shoot abundance.

Taxon
Gladiolus imbricatus L.Gladiolus imbricatust0
Outcome
best conditione0
Setting
Patch Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus imbricatus
Gladiolus imbricatus · TaxonOpioła Jerzy · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the population occurring in Patch I presents the best condition despite the lowest abundance of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑