Claim · model-written summary
Stage structure was similar across years but differed among sites.
- Taxon
- Gladiolus imbricatus L.
Gladiolus imbricatust0 - Outcome
- stage structure differs among the study sitese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The similar in consecutive years’ stage structure differs among the study sites.”
t0“Gladiolus imbricatus L.”
Title
Kinga Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt Ecological Questions 2017. doi:10.12775/eq.2017.029
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Population abundance increased across successive sites.
- Observation Shoot number fluctuated over time in all patches.
- Mechanism Juvenile, vegetative and generative shoots in Patch I may indicate successful recruitment.
- Mechanism Lack of pregenerative shoots in Patches II-IV may indicate an absence of safe sites for new genets.
- Mechanism Shoot clusters in Patches II-IV may result from clonal growth.
- Observation Generative shoot traits showed little temporal variability.
- Observation Generative shoot traits varied spatially and mostly increased from Patch I to IV.
- Observation Patch I had the best population condition despite lowest shoot abundance.