Paper · 1987 · Journal of Environmental Horticulture

Increasing Production of New Roots by Potted Roses with Root Applied IBA

C.J. Starbuck

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Dormant bare root rose ( Rosa × hybrida ‘Las Vegas’) plants with roots dipped in a 500 ppm solution of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) produced 50% more new roots than untreated plants. However, plants treated with 100 and 500 ppm IBA had fewer open flower buds 8 wks after potting and shorter average shoot length after 18 wks than did controls. Treatment with the potassium salt of IBA (KIBA) at 100 and 500 ppm also stimulated new root production and retarded flower bud development but did not reduce shoot length. Addition of starch-polyacrylate gel to treatment solutions counteracted the root promoting effect of IBA but not of KIBA. Gel itself also caused a reduction in average shoot length.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 500 ppm IBA dip produced 50% more new roots than no treatment.

Taxon
rosee0
Material
Rosa × hybrida ‘Las Vegas’e0
Treatment
roots dipped in a 500 ppm solution of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)e0
Outcome
new rootse0
Direction
moree0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Dormant bare root rose ( Rosa × hybrida ‘Las Vegas’) plants with roots dipped in a 500 ppm solution of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) produced 50% more new roots than untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA at 100 and 500 ppm reduced open flower buds at eight weeks.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
100 and 500 ppm IBAe0
Outcome
open flower budse0
Direction
fewere0
Qualifier
8 wks after pottinge0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with 100 and 500 ppm IBA had fewer open flower buds 8 wks after potting and shorter average shoot length after 18 wks than did controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA at 100 and 500 ppm shortened shoots at 18 weeks.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
100 and 500 ppm IBAe0
Outcome
average shoot lengthe0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
18 wkse0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with 100 and 500 ppm IBA had fewer open flower buds 8 wks after potting and shorter average shoot length after 18 wks than did controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KIBA at 100 and 500 ppm stimulated new root production.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
potassium salt of IBA (KIBA) at 100 and 500 ppme0
Outcome
new root productione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with the potassium salt of IBA (KIBA) at 100 and 500 ppm also stimulated new root production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KIBA at 100 and 500 ppm retarded flower bud development.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
potassium salt of IBA (KIBA) at 100 and 500 ppme0
Outcome
flower bud developmente0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with the potassium salt of IBA (KIBA) at 100 and 500 ppm also stimulated new root production and retarded flower bud development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KIBA did not reduce shoot length.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
potassium salt of IBA (KIBA) at 100 and 500 ppme0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with the potassium salt of IBA (KIBA) at 100 and 500 ppm also stimulated new root production and retarded flower bud development but did not reduce shoot length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel counteracted the root promoting effect of IBA.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
Addition of starch-polyacrylate gel to treatment solutionse0
Outcome
root promoting effect of IBAe0
Direction
counteractede0
Comparator
IBAe0

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of starch-polyacrylate gel to treatment solutions counteracted the root promoting effect of IBA but not of KIBA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel did not counteract the root promoting effect of KIBA.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
Addition of starch-polyacrylate gel to treatment solutionse0
Outcome
root promoting effecte0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
KIBAe0

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of starch-polyacrylate gel to treatment solutions counteracted the root promoting effect of IBA but not of KIBA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel alone reduced average shoot length.

Taxon
Rosest0
Treatment
Gele0
Outcome
average shoot lengthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Gel itself also caused a reduction in average shoot length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potted Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.