Abstract
The experiment was conducted oat PGI Farm, MPKV, Rahuriduring 2015-16 to study the “Effect of consortium of nitrogen fixing bacteria on yield and quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane (second ratoon)”. In this experiment 6 treatments and 4 replications used in randomized block design. There were four levels of nitrogen 0, 25, 50 and 100 % and 100 % P2O5, 100 % K2O along with and without foliar spray of consortium of endophytic nitrogen fixing bacteria. The result revealed that yield & quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane (second ratoon) were increased with foliar spray of consortium of endophytic bacteria along with 25 % N of RD. Among all the treatments, 100% N (RDF) recorded significantly highest yield and quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spray of the endophytic bacteria consortium with 25% N increased sugarcane yield and quality.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- foliar spray of consortium of endophytic bacteria along with 25 % Ne1
- Interactor
- endophytic bacteriae1symbiont
- Outcome
- yield & qualitye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- PGI Farm, MPKV, Rahurie3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane (second ratoon)”
e1“yield & quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane (second ratoon) were increased with foliar spray of consortium of endophytic bacteria along with 25 % N of RD”
e3“PGI Farm, MPKV, Rahuri”
Claim · model-written summary
Full recommended nitrogen (100% N) gave the significantly highest sugarcane yield and quality among all treatments.
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane (second ratoon)”
e2“Among all the treatments, 100% N (RDF) recorded significantly highest yield and quality”
e3“PGI Farm, MPKV, Rahuri”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →inoculation · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.