Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar spray of the endophytic bacteria consortium with 25% N increased sugarcane yield and quality.

A claim from Effect of consortium of endophytic Nitrogen fixing bacteria on yield and quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane second Ratoon · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of the endophytic bacteria consortium with 25% N increased sugarcane yield and quality.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
foliar spray of consortium of endophytic bacteria along with 25 % Ne1
Interactor
endophytic bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
yield & qualitye1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
PGI Farm, MPKV, Rahurie3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane (second ratoon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–195
e1

“yield & quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane (second ratoon) were increased with foliar spray of consortium of endophytic bacteria along with 25 % N of RD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–629
e3

“PGI Farm, MPKV, Rahuri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–55

Title

Effect of consortium of endophytic Nitrogen fixing bacteria on yield and quality of pre-seasonal sugarcane second Ratoon

Krisnpal Singh Parihar; Chauhan Mr; Patil Kb Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-e28725c232d326deadd321678036e78eb7eb107940488da2af643d0fb2ba7e48 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Longer soaking in 0℃ ice water decreased sugarcane seedling quality.

    Effects of seed cane soaking in ice water on seedling emergence rate and seedling quality of different sugarcane varieties · 2009 · compared with prolongation

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    ASPC improved raw material quality.

    Foliar Application of Amino Acids and Nutrients as a Tool to Mitigate Water Stress and Stabilize Sugarcane Yield and Bioenergy Generation · 2024 · compared with control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Foliar inputs promoted growth, productivity, and quality across harvest seasons.

    The frequency and phenological stage of foliar application of nutrients and biostimulant can increase sugarcane yield and biomass and bioenergy productions · 2024

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Half the recommended nitrogen dose applied basal, top dressing and foliar with 0.5% Zn and Cu was better for yield and quality attributes than the full recommended dose applied basal and top dressing.

    Effect of dose, time and mode of nitrogen application on yield and quality attributes of sugarcane · 2021 · compared with 100% recommended dose through basal and top dressing

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Foliar FeSO4 was better than soil-applied FeSO4 for sugarcane quality parameters

    EVALUATION OF MUSSOORIE ROCK PHOSPHATE AND PYRITE AS SOURCES OF PHOSPHORUS AND IRON FOR SUGARCANE · 1992 · compared with soil application of FeSO4

    Same direction

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    PSB improved sugarcane juice quality.

    INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHORUS SOLUBILISING BACTERIA ON SOIL AVAILABLE P STATUS AND SUGARCANE DEVELOPMENT ON A TROPICAL VERTISOL · 2001

    Same direction

  2. positive
    At 200 kg/667m2, bio-fertilizer yielded higher sugarcane yield and quality than conventional technology.

    Application Effect of Bio-organic Manure in Sugarcane · 2011

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.