Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Maize Endophytic Bacterial Diversity as Affected by Soil Cultivation History

David Correa-Galeote; Eulogio J. Bedmar; Gregorio J. Arone

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
124
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The bacterial endophytic communities residing within roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown in soils from the Quechua maize belt (Peruvian Andes) were examined using tags pyrosequencing spanning the V4 and V5 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA. Across four replicate libraries, two corresponding to sequences of endophytic bacteria from long time maize-cultivated soils and the other two obtained from fallow soils, 793 bacterial sequences were found that grouped into 188 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs, 97% genetic similarity), of which 138 were present in the libraries from the maize-cultivated soils and 80 in the libraries from fallow soils. A mean of 30 genera were found in the fallow soil libraries and 47 were in those from the maize-cultivated soils. Both alpha and beta diversity indexes showed clear differences between bacterial endophytic populations from plants with different soil cultivation history. The number of sequences corresponding to main genera Sphingomonas, Herbaspirillum, Bradyrhizobium and Methylophilus in the maize-cultivated libraries were statistically more abundant than those from the fallow soils. Sequences of genera Dyella and Sreptococcus were significantly more abundant in the libraries from the fallow soils. Relative abundance of genera Burkholderia, candidatus Glomeribacter, Staphylococcus, Variovorax, Bacillus and Chitinophaga were similar among libraries. A canonical correspondence analysis of the relative abundance of the main genera showed that the four libraries distributed in two clearly separated groups. Our results suggest that cultivation history is an important driver of endophytic colonization of maize plants as the previous 5-year plant cultivation increased richness of their bacterial endophytes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alpha and beta diversity indexes of root endophytic bacteria differed between plants grown in soils with different cultivation history.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
soil cultivation historye2
Outcome
alpha and beta diversity indexese2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both alpha and beta diversity indexes showed clear differences between bacterial endophytic populations from plants with different soil cultivation history”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–936 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphingomonas, Herbaspirillum and Bradyrhizobium sequences were statistically more abundant in maize-cultivated libraries than in fallow soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
maize-cultivated librariese2
Interactor
Sphingomonas, Herbaspirillum, BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiumHerbaspirillumSphingomonase2symbiont
Outcome
number of sequences corresponding to main genera Sphingomonas, Herbaspirillum, Bradyrhizobiume2
Direction
more abundante2
Comparator
fallow soilse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sphingomonas
Sphingomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alan Rockefeller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of sequences corresponding to main genera Sphingomonas, Herbaspirillum, Bradyrhizobium and Methylophilus in the maize-cultivated libraries were statistically more abundant than those from the fallow soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1153 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methylophilus sequences were statistically more abundant in maize-cultivated libraries than in fallow soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
maize-cultivated librariese2
Interactor
MethylophilusMethylophiluse2symbiont
Outcome
number of sequences corresponding to main generae2
Direction
more abundante2
Comparator
fallow soilse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of sequences corresponding to main genera Sphingomonas, Herbaspirillum, Bradyrhizobium and Methylophilus in the maize-cultivated libraries were statistically more abundant than those from the fallow soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1153 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dyella and Sreptococcus sequences were significantly more abundant in the libraries from fallow soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Dyella and Sreptococcuse2symbiont
Outcome
Sequences of genera Dyella and Sreptococcuse2
Direction
more abundante2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sequences of genera Dyella and Sreptococcus were significantly more abundant in the libraries from the fallow soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1270 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundance of Burkholderia, candidatus Glomeribacter and Staphylococcus was similar among libraries.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Burkholderia, candidatus Glomeribacter, StaphylococcusStaphylococcusBurkholderiaCandidatus Glomeribactere2symbiont
Outcome
Relative abundance of generae2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Staphylococcus
Staphylococcus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo Credit: Janice Carr Content Providers(s): CDC/ Matthew J. Arduino, DRPH; Janice Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia
Burkholderia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMelww at English Wikipedia · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Relative abundance of genera Burkholderia, candidatus Glomeribacter, Staphylococcus, Variovorax, Bacillus and Chitinophaga were similar among libraries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1423 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundance of Variovorax, Bacillus and Chitinophaga was similar among libraries.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Variovorax, Bacillus and Chitinophagae2symbiont
Outcome
Relative abundance of generae2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Relative abundance of genera Burkholderia, candidatus Glomeribacter, Staphylococcus, Variovorax, Bacillus and Chitinophaga were similar among libraries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1423 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four libraries separated into two clearly distinct groups in a canonical correspondence analysis of the main genera.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
the four libraries distributed in two clearly separated groupse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“A canonical correspondence analysis of the relative abundance of the main genera showed that the four libraries distributed in two clearly separated groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1580 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous 5-year maize cultivation increased the richness of root endophytic bacteria.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
previous 5-year plant cultivatione2
Outcome
richness of their bacterial endophytese2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“the previous 5-year plant cultivation increased richness of their bacterial endophytes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1782 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow-soil libraries contained a mean of 30 genera, fewer than the 47 genera in maize-cultivated soil libraries.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
maize-cultivated soilse2
Outcome
generae2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Qualifier
A mean of 30 generae2
Comparator
fallow soil librariese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“A mean of 30 genera were found in the fallow soil libraries and 47 were in those from the maize-cultivated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–779 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of 188 bacterial OTUs, 138 were present in libraries from maize-cultivated soils and 80 in libraries from fallow soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
maize-cultivated soilse2
Outcome
bacterial operational taxonomic unitse2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
138e2
Comparator
libraries from fallow soilse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“793 bacterial sequences were found that grouped into 188 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs, 97% genetic similarity), of which 138 were present in the libraries from the maize-cultivated soils and 80 in the libraries from fallow soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–665 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that cultivation history is an important driver of endophytic colonization of maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
cultivation historye2
Outcome
endophytic colonization of maize plantse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“roots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results suggest that cultivation history is an important driver of endophytic colonization of maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1692 · show in text ↑