Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Halosulfuron Methyl 75% WG (Sempra) – A New Herbicide for the Control of Cyperus rotundus in Maize (Zea mays L.) Crop in Bihar

Mritunjay Kumar

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi, (RAU, Samastipur, Bihar) for two consecutive years (2012-13 and 2013-14) to evaluate the efficacy of Halosulfuron methyl to control the Cyperus rotundus in Maize. The treatments consisted of new herbicide Halosulfuron methyl (75% WG) @ 52.5 and 67.5 g a.i./ha, applied at 3-4 leaf stage of Cyperus rotundus and compared with recommended 2,4-D Ethyl Ester 38% EC (900 g a.i./ha), Atrazine 50% WP (500 g a.i./ha) and two hand weedings at 18 and 30 DAS with untreated control. The results revealed that Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./ha recorded significantly more control of Cyperus rotundus recording 80% and 73% during 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively. The significantly higher WCE (at 30 DAS) ranging from 93% and 98% was recorded in Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./ha during 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively. The grain yield of maize was also found to be maximum in Halosulfuron methyl @ 67.5 g a.i./ha in both the years, recording 65 and 71 q/ha during 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively. Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./ha did not show any residual phytotoxicity on succeeding crop of mustard.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG at 67.5 g a.i./ha gave significantly more control of Cyperus rotundus in maize (80% and 73% in 2012-13 and 2013-14), compared with the other treatments and untreated control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0weed
Outcome
control of Cyperus rotunduse0
Direction
moree0
Value
80% and 73%e0
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./ha recorded significantly more control of Cyperus rotundus recording 80% and 73% during 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–736 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control efficiency at 30 DAS was significantly higher (93% and 98% in 2012-13 and 2013-14) with halosulfuron methyl 75% WG at 67.5 g a.i./ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
WCEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
93% and 98%e0
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly higher WCE (at 30 DAS) ranging from 93% and 98% was recorded in Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./ha during 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was maximum with halosulfuron methyl at 67.5 g a.i./ha in both years, 65 and 71 q/ha in 2012-13 and 2013-14.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Halosulfuron methyl @ 67.5 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
65 and 71 q/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield of maize was also found to be maximum in Halosulfuron methyl @ 67.5 g a.i./ha in both the years, recording 65 and 71 q/ha during 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG at 67.5 g a.i./ha showed no residual phytotoxicity on a succeeding mustard crop.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
residual phytotoxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Halosulfuron methyl 75% WG @ 67.5 g a.i./ha did not show any residual phytotoxicity on succeeding crop of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1199 · show in text ↑

methyl · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · Cyperus rotundus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

methyl · Cyperus rotundus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

methyl · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.