Paper · 2017 · Acta agriculturae Serbica

Grain yield of maize hybrids at different plant densities

Milomirka Madić; Nikola Bokan; Marija Živić; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Field trials with 12 maize hybrids belonging to FAO maturity groups 500, 600 and 700 were established under the agro environmental conditions of Smederevo in 2010 and 2011 to analyse grain yield and moisture content at different plant densities. The hybrids were sown in two independent trials in the two years at 51,000 and 62,000 plants ha-1, respectively, in a randomised block design with three replications. More favourable maize growing conditions i.e. more moderate air temperatures during the growing season, a more even distribution of precipitation and more rainy days were recorded in 2010 than in 2011, which had much lower precipitation amounts, particularly during July and August i.e. critical development stages (flowering and fertilization) of these hybrids. Grain yield of all maize hybrids was higher in 2010, mostly as the result of greater amounts of precipitation and their more even distribution during the growing season. In both years, significantly higher grain yields were obtained by FAO 600 maize hybrids. Grain yield in 2010 was significantly higher at the higher plant density in FAO 500 hybrids, as opposed to FAO 600 hybrids, which showed no significant difference in grain yield across plant densities. Grain moisture content at harvest did not significantly differ between plant densities in either year. Somewhat higher values for grain moisture at harvest in 2010 were recorded for FAO 600 hybrids. In 2011, there were no significant differences in grain moisture content among hybrids, nor between plant densities, mostly due to the very low amount of precipitation in the second part of the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was higher in 2010 than 2011 for all hybrids.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2010e0
Setting
Smederevoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of all maize hybrids was higher in 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“Smederevo in 2010 and 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FAO 600 hybrids had significantly higher grain yields in both years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
FAO 600 maize hybridse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both years, significantly higher grain yields were obtained by FAO 600 maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher plant density significantly raised FAO 500 hybrid grain yield in 2010.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
FAO 500 hybridse0
Treatment
higher plant densitye0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
51,000e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield in 2010 was significantly higher at the higher plant density in FAO 500 hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“51,000 and 62,000 plants ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FAO 600 hybrid grain yield did not differ significantly between plant densities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
FAO 600 hybridse0
Treatment
plant densitiese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FAO 600 hybrids, which showed no significant difference in grain yield across plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain moisture at harvest did not differ significantly between densities in either year.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plant densitiese0
Outcome
Grain moisture content at harveste0
Direction
did not significantly differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain moisture content at harvest did not significantly differ between plant densities in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FAO 600 hybrids had somewhat higher grain moisture in 2010.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
FAO 600 hybridse0
Outcome
grain moisture at harveste0
Direction
Somewhat highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Somewhat higher values for grain moisture at harvest in 2010 were recorded for FAO 600 hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain moisture did not differ significantly among hybrids in 2011.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
hybridse0
Outcome
grain moisture contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2011, there were no significant differences in grain moisture content among hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑

density · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 12 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.