Paper · 2018 · European Journal of Agronomy

Legumes used as cover crops to reduce fertilisation problems improving soil nitrate in an organic orchard

Rafaela Ordóñez-Fernández; Miguel Angel Repullo-Ruibérriz de Torres; Javier Márquez-García; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
61
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The organic olive orchard represents an economic opportunity for certain rural areas that are not very agriculturally productive. Those are usually mountainous areas, with high slopes and acid shallow soils with little organic matter. The implementation of a legume cover crop in these organic olive orchards would reduce erosive processes and increase the amount of nitrogen in the soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate, during three cropping seasons (2010–2013), the possibilities of implantation and behaviour of different species of leguminous plants as a cover crop in the organic olive orchard, estimating their capacity to protect the soil, increasing the amount of nitrogen in soil when the tree most needs it and determining the proper management of the plant residues of these covers during the decomposition process that maximizes this contribution. The results obtained indicate that Vicia ervilia was the legume that presented the best behaviour in the increase of the nitrate content in the soil. Regarding the soil management system, the use of the residues obtained by the process of field mowing increased the soil nitrate either under no-tillage and tillage system. Nevertheless, the nitrate content was higher in tilled soils than in those where covers were only left on the surface. In May of the second season, V. ervilia accumulated 85 kg ha−1 of nitrate in the first 20 cm of soil in tillage, being 40 kg ha−1 in the no-tillage system. Regarding the protection of soil against erosive agents, none of the studied species were effective in protecting the soil until the next sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicia ervilia gave the best increase in soil nitrate content among tested legumes.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
Vicia erviliae0
Outcome
nitrate content in the soile0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
different species of leguminous plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vicia ervilia was the legume that presented the best behaviour in the increase of the nitrate content in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic olive orchard represents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e2

“different species of leguminous plants as a cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field mowing residues increased soil nitrate under both no-tillage and tillage.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
residues obtained by the process of field mowinge0
Outcome
soil nitratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under no-tillage and tillage systeme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of the residues obtained by the process of field mowing increased the soil nitrate either under no-tillage and tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic olive orchard represents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tilled soils had higher nitrate than soils with covers left on the surface.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
tilled soilse0
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
covers were only left on the surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrate content was higher in tilled soils than in those where covers were only left on the surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1314 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic olive orchard represents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In May of the second season V. ervilia accumulated 85 kg ha−1 nitrate under tillage.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Material
V. erviliae0
Outcome
nitratee0
Value
85 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
May of the second seasone0
Setting
tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In May of the second season, V. ervilia accumulated 85 kg ha−1 of nitrate in the first 20 cm of soil in tillage, being 40 kg ha−1 in the no-tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic olive orchard represents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In May of the second season V. ervilia accumulated 40 kg ha−1 nitrate under no-tillage.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Material
V. erviliae0
Outcome
nitratee0
Value
40 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
May of the second seasone0
Setting
no-tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In May of the second season, V. ervilia accumulated 85 kg ha−1 of nitrate in the first 20 cm of soil in tillage, being 40 kg ha−1 in the no-tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic olive orchard represents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the studied cover species protected soil from erosion until the next sowing.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Outcome
protecting the soile0
Qualifier
until the next sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the studied species were effective in protecting the soil until the next sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1616 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic olive orchard represents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑

pruning · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.