Paper · 2014 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Influence of pruning time and severity on growth, fruit quality and leaf nutrient status of olive (Olea europea ) cv Frontoio

AMIT JASROTIA; V K WALI; PARSHANT BAKSHI; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during the year 2008-09 and 2009-10 comprising three dates of pruning, i.e. 1 January, 15 January, 30 January and three intensities of pruning, i.e. 20%; 25%; 30% to find out the optimum time and intensity of pruning in olive (Olea europea L.) cv Frontoio. The results revealed that maximum increase in trunk circumference (7.18%) was found in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity whereas maximum shoot extension growth (11.13 cm) and leaf area (3.99 cm2) was measured in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity. However, significantly higher chlorophyll content of 1.57 mg/g was found in trees pruned on 15 January with 30% pruning intensity. The maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity. The highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively. The leaf Ca (1.70%) and Mg (0.141%) were highest in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 1 January at 20% gave maximum trunk circumference increase of 7.18%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
trunk circumferencee0
Direction
maximum increasee0
Value
7.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum increase in trunk circumference (7.18%) was found in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum shoot extension growth of 11.13 cm.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
shoot extension growthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.13 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum shoot extension growth (11.13 cm) and leaf area (3.99 cm2) was measured in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum leaf area of 3.99 cm2.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.99 cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum shoot extension growth (11.13 cm) and leaf area (3.99 cm2) was measured in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 30% gave significantly higher chlorophyll content of 1.57 mg/g.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.57 mg/ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher chlorophyll content of 1.57 mg/g was found in trees pruned on 15 January with 30% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum fruit size of 1.76 cm.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.76 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum fruit weight of 2.41 g.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.41 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum fruit volume of 2.35cc.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
volumee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.35cce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum pulp to stone ratio of 3.62.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
pulp: stone ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.62e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum oil content of 27.03%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
27.03%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N was highest at 1.91% after 30 January pruning at 30%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
leaf Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P was highest at 0.243% after 1 January pruning at 30%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
1 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.243%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K was highest at 1.99% after 15 January pruning at 30%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
15 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Ca was highest at 1.70% after 1 January pruning at 20%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
leaf Cae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf Ca (1.70%) and Mg (0.141%) were highest in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Mg was highest at 0.141% after 1 January pruning at 20%.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensitye0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.141%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf Ca (1.70%) and Mg (0.141%) were highest in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

pruning · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

pruning · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.