Abstract
An experiment was conducted during the year 2008-09 and 2009-10 comprising three dates of pruning, i.e. 1 January, 15 January, 30 January and three intensities of pruning, i.e. 20%; 25%; 30% to find out the optimum time and intensity of pruning in olive (Olea europea L.) cv Frontoio. The results revealed that maximum increase in trunk circumference (7.18%) was found in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity whereas maximum shoot extension growth (11.13 cm) and leaf area (3.99 cm2) was measured in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity. However, significantly higher chlorophyll content of 1.57 mg/g was found in trees pruned on 15 January with 30% pruning intensity. The maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity. The highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively. The leaf Ca (1.70%) and Mg (0.141%) were highest in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 1 January at 20% gave maximum trunk circumference increase of 7.18%.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- trunk circumferencee0
- Direction
- maximum increasee0
- Value
- 7.18%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum increase in trunk circumference (7.18%) was found in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum shoot extension growth of 11.13 cm.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- shoot extension growthe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 11.13 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum shoot extension growth (11.13 cm) and leaf area (3.99 cm2) was measured in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum leaf area of 3.99 cm2.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.99 cm2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum shoot extension growth (11.13 cm) and leaf area (3.99 cm2) was measured in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 30% gave significantly higher chlorophyll content of 1.57 mg/g.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.57 mg/ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly higher chlorophyll content of 1.57 mg/g was found in trees pruned on 15 January with 30% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum fruit size of 1.76 cm.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- sizee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1.76 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum fruit weight of 2.41 g.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- weighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.41 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum fruit volume of 2.35cc.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- volumee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.35cce0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum pulp to stone ratio of 3.62.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- pulp: stone ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.62e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning on 15 January at 25% gave maximum oil content of 27.03%.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- oil contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 27.03%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum fruit quality characters, viz. size (1.76 cm), weight (2.41 g), volume (2.35cc), pulp: stone ratio (3.62) and oil content (27.03%) were observed in trees pruned on 15 January with 25% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf N was highest at 1.91% after 30 January pruning at 30%.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- leaf Ne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.91%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf P was highest at 0.243% after 1 January pruning at 30%.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- 1 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.243%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf K was highest at 1.99% after 15 January pruning at 30%.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- 15 January with 30% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.99%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest leaf N (1.91%), P (0.243%) and K (1.99%) was found in trees pruned on 30 January with 30% pruning intensity, 1 January with 30% pruning intensity and 15 January with 30% pruning intensity, respectively”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Ca was highest at 1.70% after 1 January pruning at 20%.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- leaf Cae0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.70%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“leaf Ca (1.70%) and Mg (0.141%) were highest in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Mg was highest at 0.141% after 1 January pruning at 20%.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensitye0
- Outcome
- Mge0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.141%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“leaf Ca (1.70%) and Mg (0.141%) were highest in trees pruned on 1 January with 20% pruning intensity”
t0“olive”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
pruning · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →pruning · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.