Paper · 2017 · THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE

Influence of time and intensity of pruning on quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. LUCKNOW 49

ASWATHY SURESH; ARUMUGAM SHAKILA

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation on influence of time and intensity of pruning on quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. LUCKNOW 49 was conducted at the orchard of the Department of Horticulture, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu. Five years old guava trees of the cultivar Lucknow 49 were taken for this investigation. Different pruning levels and time of pruning viz., pruning 10 cm, 20 cm, 30 cm of apical shoots during mid March, mid April, mid May comprised the treatment combinations. The effect of different treatments were evaluated based on their influence on the quality attributes viz., TSS, ascorbic acid content, acidity, total sugar content. Among the various pruning treatments, it was observed that pruning 30 cm of apical shoots during mid March proved to be the best in increasing the quality of fruits followed by 20 cm level of pruning during mid March. The results of the present study indicate that the effect of various pruning treatments on the quality of guava cv. LUCKNOW 49 was more pronounced in season II when compared to season I.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning 30 cm of apical shoots in mid March gave the best guava fruit quality, followed by 20 cm pruning in mid March.

Material
LUCKNOW 49t0
Treatment
pruning 30 cm of apical shoots during mid Marche0
Outcome
quality of fruitse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
20 cm level of pruning during mid Marche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pruning 30 cm of apical shoots during mid March proved to be the best in increasing the quality of fruits followed by 20 cm level of pruning during mid March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. LUCKNOW 49”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning effects on guava fruit quality were more pronounced in season II than season I.

Material
LUCKNOW 49e0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
season IIe0
Comparator
season Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of various pruning treatments on the quality of guava cv. LUCKNOW 49 was more pronounced in season II when compared to season I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1054 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.