Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Different Pruning Techniques and Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Leaf Yield of Mulberry and Its Impact on Silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) Bioassay

A. Thangamalar; K. Ramamoorthy; S. Prabhu; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out during Kharif and Rabi seasons of two years at the Department of Sericulture, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to study the influence of different pruning heights in mulberry and integrated nutrient management (INM) practices on growth, leaf and cocoon productivity as well as profitability in mulberry. The experiments were laid out in a strip plot design with three main plot treatments and six sub plot treatments replicated thrice. The results revealed that middle pruning (90 cm height) technique had positive impact on mulberry growth parameters such as less intermodal length with significantly high shoot length, number of branches per plant during both kharif and rabi seasons of the respective years. Further, the yield attributes viz., leaf dry weight, 100 leaves weight, leaf yield per plant and leaf yield/ha/harvest were also significantly higher in middle pruning technique. Among the integrated nutrient management practices, 50% organic + 50% inorganic fertilizers (M2) application showed significantly better mulberry growth and yield parameters. The same treatment contributed significantly higher silkworm economical parameters viz., larval weight, cocoon weight, shell weight, shell ratio and ERR per cent in both the seasons. The mean economics of mulberry leaves production and silkworm cocoon production were enhanced with higher B: C ratio of 2.76, 2.16 in mulberry and 2.70, 2.06 in silkworm, respectively, during kharif and rabi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle pruning reduced mulberry internodal length.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
middle pruning (90 cm height)e0
Outcome
intermodal lengthe0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“middle pruning (90 cm height) technique had positive impact on mulberry growth parameters such as less intermodal length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle pruning produced high shoot length and branch number.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
middle pruning (90 cm height)e0
Outcome
shoot length, number of branches per plante0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“middle pruning (90 cm height) technique had positive impact on mulberry growth parameters such as less intermodal length with significantly high shoot length, number of branches per plant during both kharif and rabi seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle pruning increased three leaf yield attributes.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
middle pruning techniquee0
Outcome
leaf dry weight, 100 leaves weight, leaf yield per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“leaf dry weight, 100 leaves weight, leaf yield per plant and leaf yield/ha/harvest were also significantly higher in middle pruning technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle pruning increased leaf yield per hectare per harvest.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
middle pruning techniquee0
Outcome
leaf yield/ha/harveste0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“leaf yield/ha/harvest were also significantly higher in middle pruning technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed organic and inorganic fertilizer improved mulberry growth and yield.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
50% organic + 50% inorganic fertilizers (M2)e0
Outcome
mulberry growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“50% organic + 50% inorganic fertilizers (M2) application showed significantly better mulberry growth and yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed fertilizer treatment improved three silkworm weight measures.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Interactor
silkwormBombyx morie0herbivore
Outcome
silkworm economical parameters viz., larval weight, cocoon weight, shell weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bombyx mori
Bombyx mori · InteractorOakenking at en.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment contributed significantly higher silkworm economical parameters viz., larval weight, cocoon weight, shell weight, shell ratio and ERR per cent in both the seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed fertilizer treatment improved silkworm shell ratio and ERR.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Interactor
silkwormBombyx morie0herbivore
Outcome
shell ratio and ERR per cente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bombyx mori
Bombyx mori · InteractorOakenking at en.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment contributed significantly higher silkworm economical parameters viz., larval weight, cocoon weight, shell weight, shell ratio and ERR per cent in both the seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulberry leaf production had higher benefit-cost ratios.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.76, 2.16e0

Verbatim

e0

“higher B: C ratio of 2.76, 2.16 in mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1439 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silkworm cocoon production had benefit-cost ratios of 2.70 and 2.06.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Interactor
silkwormBombyx morie0herbivore
Outcome
silkworme0
Value
2.70, 2.06e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bombyx mori
Bombyx mori · InteractorOakenking at en.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.70, 2.06 in silkworm, respectively, during kharif and rabi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–110 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

pruning · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.