Paper · 2018 · Experimental Agriculture

HEAD RICE YIELD OF CROPS HARVESTED BY COMBINE AND HAND AT DIFFERENT RIPENING TIMES IN CAMBODIA

SOM BUNNA; HOURN SEREYVUTH; YIM SOMALY; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Experiments were conducted across 2 years to determine the effect of harvesting methods – combine harvester and hand harvesting – and harvest time during ripening on milling quality of long grain rice grown in the rainfed lowland ecosystem in Cambodia. Head rice yield (HRY) was highest when rice was harvested 25 days after flowering and decreased with delay in harvesting at 35 and 45 days after flowering. This was accompanied by a general decline in grain moisture content at harvest, although it was still high at 24–25% at 35 days after flowering. The decline in HRY was associated with increases in fissured grain percentage observed immediately after harvest. Hand harvesting produced 2–6% higher HRY than combine harvesting. Fissured grain in hand harvested crops was lower in year 1, but was similar to combine harvested crops in year 2. Both hand and combine harvested crops were sun-dried but rough rice harvested by combine was dried on plastic sheet and this may have contributed to reduction in HRY. Maximum HRY percentage was only about 44% and the factors contributing to this low HRY were discussed. Harvesting time and methods had no significant effect on grain yield, but the field grain loss during the harvesting operation was 2–5% higher in combine than hand harvesting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head rice yield peaked at 25 days after flowering and fell with later harvest.

Treatment
delay in harvesting at 35 and 45 days after floweringe0
Outcome
Head rice yield (HRY)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
25 days after floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Head rice yield (HRY) was highest when rice was harvested 25 days after flowering and decreased with delay in harvesting at 35 and 45 days after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–415 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain moisture declined with delayed harvest.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain moisture contente0
Direction
declinee0
Value
24–25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was accompanied by a general decline in grain moisture content at harvest, although it was still high at 24–25% at 35 days after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower head rice yield was associated with more fissured grain.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
HRYe0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
increases in fissured grain percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decline in HRY was associated with increases in fissured grain percentage observed immediately after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand harvest yielded 2–6% more head rice than combine harvest.

Treatment
Hand harvestinge0
Outcome
HRYe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2–6%e0
Comparator
combine harvestinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand harvesting produced 2–6% higher HRY than combine harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand harvested crops had less fissured grain in year one.

Treatment
hand harvested cropse0
Outcome
Fissured graine0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
year 1e0
Comparator
combine harvested cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fissured grain in hand harvested crops was lower in year 1, but was similar to combine harvested crops in year 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fissured grain was similar between harvest methods in year two.

Treatment
hand harvested cropse0
Outcome
Fissured graine0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
year 2e0
Comparator
combine harvested cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fissured grain in hand harvested crops was lower in year 1, but was similar to combine harvested crops in year 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum head rice yield was about 44%.

Outcome
Maximum HRY percentagee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
about 44%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum HRY percentage was only about 44%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest method and timing had no significant effect on grain yield.

Treatment
Harvesting time and methodse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting time and methods had no significant effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combine harvest caused 2–5% more field grain loss than hand harvest.

Treatment
combinee0
Outcome
field grain losse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2–5%e0
Comparator
hand harvestinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the field grain loss during the harvesting operation was 2–5% higher in combine than hand harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 5–9 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Combined zinc treatment increased test weight to 30.18 g.

    Effect of foliar application of zinc on biofortified rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2022 · compared with soil application alone and single spray of Zn and most other treatments

    Opposite direction

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

harvest time · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.