Paper · 2018 · Journal of Agricultural Sciences – Sri Lanka

Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing in East Shewa, Ethiopia

Wakjira Tesfahun

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Purpose: Soil fertility maintenance is a major concern in tropical Africa which needs to tackle soil fertility depletion as fundamental constraints. Similarly, the traditional way of planting tef reduces the amount of grain production, promotes competition for inputs and causes severe lodging. In this view, a study was to investigate the effect of sowing methods and NPS fertilizer application on tef production.Research method: A factorial experiment was laid out in RCBD with12 treatment combination and three replications at DebreZeit Agricultural Research Center. The first factor included six NPS fertilizer rates and the second factor included two methods of sowing. Relevant data were gathered and analyzed using SAS and mean difference were compared using LSD.Findings: The results of the study revealed that the analysis of variance among fertilizer rates and method of sowing showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) on almost all the tef characters tested. The shortest mean days to 50% panicle emergence (57.5) of teff were obtained from 120kg of NPS fertilizer. However, applied NPS fertilizer showed no significant difference on tef physiological maturity. The highest grain yield (3.77t ha-1), biomass yield (10.09 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.32 t ha-1) were recorded from combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting method. Blended fertilizer together with transplanting had improved the number of effective tiller and grain yield, biomass yield as well as straw yield. Therefore, 120 kg ha-1of NPS fertilizer and transplanting method can be suggested as one effective way to maximize grain yield of tef.Research Limitation: Further validation and demonstrations across multiple areas would be necessary to make conclusive recommendation since the experiment was conducted for sole season and site.Originality/Value: This study provides insights for farmers and stakeholders to incorporate blended fertilizer for soil fertility amendment and in encouraging of tef transplanting technology for boosting production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPS fertilizer rates and sowing method significantly affected almost all tef characters tested.

Treatment
fertilizer rates and method of sowinge1
Outcome
almost all the tef characters testede1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“analysis of variance among fertilizer rates and method of sowing showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) on almost all the tef characters tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shortest time to 50% panicle emergence was obtained with 120 kg NPS fertilizer.

Organ / stage
panicle emergencee2
Treatment
120kg of NPS fertilizere2
Outcome
days to 50% panicle emergencee2
Direction
shorteste2
Value
57.5e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e2

“The shortest mean days to 50% panicle emergence (57.5) of teff were obtained from 120kg of NPS fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied NPS fertilizer did not significantly affect tef physiological maturity.

Treatment
applied NPS fertilizere3
Outcome
tef physiological maturitye3
Direction
no significant differencee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e3

“applied NPS fertilizer showed no significant difference on tef physiological maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield was obtained from the combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting.

Treatment
combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting methode4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
3.77t ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest grain yield (3.77t ha-1), biomass yield (10.09 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.32 t ha-1) were recorded from combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest biomass yield was obtained from the combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting.

Treatment
combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting methode4
Outcome
biomass yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
10.09 t ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest grain yield (3.77t ha-1), biomass yield (10.09 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.32 t ha-1) were recorded from combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest straw yield was obtained from the combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting.

Treatment
combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting methode4
Outcome
straw yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
6.32 t ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest grain yield (3.77t ha-1), biomass yield (10.09 t ha-1) and straw yield (6.32 t ha-1) were recorded from combination of 120 kg NPS fertilizer and transplanting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended fertilizer together with transplanting improved the number of effective tillers.

Treatment
Blended fertilizer together with transplantinge5
Outcome
number of effective tillere5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e5

“Blended fertilizer together with transplanting had improved the number of effective tiller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1443 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg ha-1 NPS fertilizer with transplanting can be suggested to maximize tef grain yield.

Treatment
120 kg ha-1of NPS fertilizer and transplanting methode6
Outcome
maximize grain yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 · show in text ↑
e6

“120 kg ha-1of NPS fertilizer and transplanting method can be suggested as one effective way to maximize grain yield of tef”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1632 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Eragrostis tef (tef)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Eragrostis tef (tef)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · yield · Eragrostis tef (tef)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.