Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Performance of Chickpea under Raised Bed Planting in Vertisols in Central India

Prashant Shrivastava; Yati Raj Khare; D.K. Pahalwan

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An assessment of raised bed sowing of chickpea was done during rabi season in the vertisols of Narsinghpur district of Madhya Pradesh in Central India. The study was conducted for two consecutive years viz. 2014-15 and 2015-16. Chickpea variety JG-63 was considered for the study. Average crop yield under the flat bed planting was observed to be 11.95 q/ha whereas the same under the raised bed planting was 15.15 q/ha. Thus an increase of nearly 28 percent was obtained in crop yield when planted on raised beds. The average net return in the case of raised bed planting was Rs. 29010/- per ha whereas that under raised bed planting was observed to be Rs. 42248/- per ha. Thus an increase of Rs. 13238/- per ha was observed under the raised bed planting. With regard to B: C ratio the one under raised bed planting (2.67) was found to be higher than that under the flat bed planting (2.205). Overall the raised bed planting performed better than the flat bed planting in the case of chickpea in vertisol region of central India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds increased chickpea yield by nearly 28 percent relative to flat beds.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
nearly 28 percente0
Qualifier
11.95 q/hae0
Comparator
flat bed plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average crop yield under the flat bed planting was observed to be 11.95 q/ha whereas the same under the raised bed planting was 15.15 q/ha. Thus an increase of nearly 28 percent was obtained in crop yield when planted on raised beds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting increased net return by Rs. 13238/- per ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
increasee0
Value
Rs. 13238/- per hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus an increase of Rs. 13238/- per ha was observed under the raised bed planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–756 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average net return in the case of raised bed planting was Rs. 29010/- per ha whereas that under raised bed planting was observed to be Rs. 42248/- per ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds had a higher benefit-cost ratio than flat beds.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.67e0
Qualifier
2.205e0
Comparator
flat bed plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With regard to B: C ratio the one under raised bed planting (2.67) was found to be higher than that under the flat bed planting (2.205).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–23 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.