Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-tillage reduced plant productivity except for weeds, especially in garbanzo.

A claim from Soil Food Webs and Carbon Dynamics in Response to Conservation Tillage in California · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage reduced plant productivity except for weeds, especially in garbanzo.

Taxon
garbanzoCicer arietinume7
Treatment
no‐tillagee0
Outcome
Plant productivitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
except for weedse0
Comparator
standard tillage + continuous croppinge1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant productivity, except for weeds, was reduced by no‐tillage, especially in the garbanzo crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1659
e1

“standard tillage + continuous cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–288
e7

“garbanzo ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–488

Title

Soil Food Webs and Carbon Dynamics in Response to Conservation Tillage in California

H. Minoshima; L.E. Jackson; T.R. Cavagnaro; et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2007. doi:10.2136/sssaj2006.0174

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e1dbbbebe3eef357e9df04e579e43dc6da001500ffde848d46bf6a6b465fdec6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.