Paper · 2011 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of tillage and weed control on weed dynamics, crop productivity and energy-use efficiency in rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping systems in Vertisols

J. S. Mishra; V. P. Singh

17
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during winters of 2004–06 on a Typic Chromusterts soils at Jabalpur to study the effect of tillage and weed control on weed dynamics, productivity and energy-use efficiency of various oilseeds and pulses grown in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systems. Results revealed that zero tillage significantly increased the population of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) but reduced the problem of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) compared with the conventional tillage. The suppressing effect of crops on total weed dry matter was in order of pea (Pisum sativum L.) > linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) > mustard (Brassica juncea Czernj & Cosson) > chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) > lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha significantly reduced the dry biomass of all weeds except common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Higher yields of mustard, lentil and chickpea were recorded under conventional tillage and that of field pea under zero tillage. Field pea proved most economical under zero tillage with net returns of ` 23 199/ha and benefit:cost ratio of 2.87. However, the Indian mustard was more economical under conventional tillage (` 21 039 and 2.31). The maximum energy productivity was obtained under zero tillage in all the crops. The highest output energy (50 675 MJ/ha) and energy output : input ratio (5.02) were obtained from mustard in conventional tillage with pendimethalin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage increased common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systemsOryza sativae1
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Interactor
common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)Vicia sativae0weed
Outcome
population of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that zero tillage significantly increased the population of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) but reduced the problem of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) compared with the conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted during winters of 2004–06 on a Typic Chromusterts soils at Jabalpur to study the effect of tillage and weed control on weed dynamics, productivity and energy-use efficiency of various oilseeds and pulses grown in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage reduced common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systemsOryza sativae1
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Interactor
common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)Chenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
problem of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that zero tillage significantly increased the population of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) but reduced the problem of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) compared with the conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted during winters of 2004–06 on a Typic Chromusterts soils at Jabalpur to study the effect of tillage and weed control on weed dynamics, productivity and energy-use efficiency of various oilseeds and pulses grown in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop suppression of weed dry matter ranked pea, linseed, mustard, chickpea, then lentil.

Taxon
pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
Outcome
suppressing effect of crops on total weed dry mattere0
Comparator
linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) > mustard (Brassica juncea Czernj & Cosson) > chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) > lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The suppressing effect of crops on total weed dry matter was in order of pea (Pisum sativum L.) > linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) > mustard (Brassica juncea Czernj & Cosson) > chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) > lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin reduced dry biomass of weeds other than common vetch.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systemsOryza sativae1
Treatment
pendimethalin 1.0 kg/hae0
Interactor
common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)Vicia sativae0weed
Outcome
dry biomass of all weeds except common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha significantly reduced the dry biomass of all weeds except common vetch (Vicia sativa L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted during winters of 2004–06 on a Typic Chromusterts soils at Jabalpur to study the effect of tillage and weed control on weed dynamics, productivity and energy-use efficiency of various oilseeds and pulses grown in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common vetch dry biomass was not reduced by pendimethalin.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systemsOryza sativae1
Treatment
pendimethalin 1.0 kg/hae0
Interactor
common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)Vicia sativae0weed
Outcome
common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha significantly reduced the dry biomass of all weeds except common vetch (Vicia sativa L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted during winters of 2004–06 on a Typic Chromusterts soils at Jabalpur to study the effect of tillage and weed control on weed dynamics, productivity and energy-use efficiency of various oilseeds and pulses grown in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

mustard had higher yield under conventional tillage.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yields of mustard, lentil and chickpea were recorded under conventional tillage and that of field pea under zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

lentil had higher yield under conventional tillage.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yields of mustard, lentil and chickpea were recorded under conventional tillage and that of field pea under zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chickpea had higher yield under conventional tillage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yields of mustard, lentil and chickpea were recorded under conventional tillage and that of field pea under zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

field pea had higher yield under zero tillage.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yields of mustard, lentil and chickpea were recorded under conventional tillage and that of field pea under zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pea under zero tillage had net returns of ` 23 199/ha.

Taxon
Field peae0
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
` 23 199/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Field pea proved most economical under zero tillage with net returns of ` 23 199/ha and benefit:cost ratio of 2.87.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pea under zero tillage had benefit:cost ratio of 2.87.

Taxon
Field peae0
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
benefit:cost ratioe0
Value
2.87e0

Verbatim

e0

“Field pea proved most economical under zero tillage with net returns of ` 23 199/ha and benefit:cost ratio of 2.87.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard was more economical under conventional tillage.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
more economicale0
Direction
more economicale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the Indian mustard was more economical under conventional tillage (` 21 039 and 2.31).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard conventional tillage economic metric was ` 21 039.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
more economicale0
Value
` 21 039e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the Indian mustard was more economical under conventional tillage (` 21 039 and 2.31).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard conventional tillage economic metric was 2.31.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
more economicale0
Value
2.31e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the Indian mustard was more economical under conventional tillage (` 21 039 and 2.31).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy productivity was maximal under zero tillage across crops.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systemsOryza sativae1
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
energy productivitye0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum energy productivity was obtained under zero tillage in all the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted during winters of 2004–06 on a Typic Chromusterts soils at Jabalpur to study the effect of tillage and weed control on weed dynamics, productivity and energy-use efficiency of various oilseeds and pulses grown in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard under conventional tillage with pendimethalin had highest output energy, 50 675 MJ/ha.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
conventional tillage with pendimethaline0
Outcome
output energye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
50 675 MJ/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest output energy (50 675 MJ/ha) and energy output : input ratio (5.02) were obtained from mustard in conventional tillage with pendimethalin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1460 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard under conventional tillage with pendimethalin had highest energy output : input ratio, 5.02.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
conventional tillage with pendimethaline0
Outcome
energy output : input ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.02e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest output energy (50 675 MJ/ha) and energy output : input ratio (5.02) were obtained from mustard in conventional tillage with pendimethalin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1460 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.