Paper · 2019 · Journal of Krishi Vigyan

Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya

Tanmay Samajdar; N Arunkumar Singh; Mokidul Islam; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Frontline demonstrations were carried out at 859 farmers’ field of four districts covering an area of 238.68 ha in 89 villages of Garo Hill districts, Meghalaya during rabi season, 2013–2016 to study the effect of different cultivars and tillage methods on growth, yield and economics of lentil in rice fallow areas. The cultivars of lentil evaluated were HUL 57, WBL 77, Patnai (local) and tillage methods were conventional, relay and zero tillage. Results revealed that the higher significant values were recorded under conventional sowing incorporating bio fertilizer (Rhizobium) in terms of seed yield (8.62 q/ha) and net return (Rs. 28, 103/ha). However, as per benefit cost ratio, highest values were found in relay cropping (2.80) in comparison to other sowing methods. Significantly lower seed yield was recorded in zero tillage than conventional and relay cultivation methods. Among the varieties tested, WBL77 produced the highest seed yield of 7.28 q/ha which showed 45.30 per cent increase over the local variety, a net return of Rs.26643/ha and a benefit cost ratio of 2.76. The lowest production and net returns were found in zero tillage cultivation method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional sowing with Rhizobium bio fertilizer gave higher seed yield (8.62 q/ha).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
conventional sowing incorporating bio fertilizer (Rhizobium)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
8.62 q/hae1
Setting
Garo Hills, Meghalayat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed that the higher significant values were recorded under conventional sowing incorporating bio fertilizer (Rhizobium) in terms of seed yield (8.62 q/ha) and net return (Rs. 28, 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional sowing with Rhizobium bio fertilizer gave higher net return (Rs. 28, 103/ha).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
conventional sowing incorporating bio fertilizer (Rhizobium)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
highere1
Value
Rs. 28, 103/hae1
Setting
Garo Hills, Meghalayat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed that the higher significant values were recorded under conventional sowing incorporating bio fertilizer (Rhizobium) in terms of seed yield (8.62 q/ha) and net return (Rs. 28, 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay cropping gave the highest benefit cost ratio (2.80) compared with other sowing methods.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
relay croppinge3
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
2.80e3
Comparator
other sowing methodse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, as per benefit cost ratio, highest values were found in relay cropping (2.80) in comparison to other sowing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage gave significantly lower seed yield than conventional and relay cultivation.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
zero tillagee4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
conventional and relay cultivation methodse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significantly lower seed yield was recorded in zero tillage than conventional and relay cultivation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–884 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the varieties tested, WBL77 produced the highest seed yield (7.28 q/ha).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Material
WBL77e5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
7.28 q/hae5
Comparator
the varieties testede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among the varieties tested, WBL77 produced the highest seed yield of 7.28 q/ha which showed 45.30 per cent increase over the local variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WBL77 gave a 45.30 per cent seed yield increase over the local variety.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
WBL77e5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Value
45.30 per cente5
Comparator
local varietye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among the varieties tested, WBL77 produced the highest seed yield of 7.28 q/ha which showed 45.30 per cent increase over the local variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WBL77 gave a net return of Rs.26643/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Material
WBL77e5
Outcome
net returne7
Value
Rs.26643/hae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among the varieties tested, WBL77 produced the highest seed yield of 7.28 q/ha which showed 45.30 per cent increase over the local variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1024 · show in text ↑
e7

“a net return of Rs.26643/ha and a benefit cost ratio of 2.76”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WBL77 gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.76.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Material
WBL77e5
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe7
Value
2.76e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among the varieties tested, WBL77 produced the highest seed yield of 7.28 q/ha which showed 45.30 per cent increase over the local variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1024 · show in text ↑
e7

“a net return of Rs.26643/ha and a benefit cost ratio of 2.76”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage cultivation gave the lowest production and net returns.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
zero tillage cultivation methode7
Outcome
production and net returnse7
Direction
loweste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Cultivars and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Economics of Lentil Under Rice-Lentil System in Garo Hills, Meghalaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
e7

“The lowest production and net returns were found in zero tillage cultivation method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1171 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

tillage · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

intercropping · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.