Paper · 2000 · Experimental Agriculture

TILLAGE SYSTEMS AND STUBBLE MANAGEMENT IN A MEDITERRANEAN-TYPE ENVIRONMENT IN RELATION TO CROP YIELD AND SOIL MOISTURE

M. PALA; H. C. HARRIS; J. RYAN; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of tillage and crop rotations can only be seen over many crop years. Crop yield and soil results are evaluated from two long-term trials, established in 1978–79 and 1985–86 to investigate various forms of tillage and the timing of such operations in various wheat ( Triticum aestivum )-based rotations on a Calcixerollic Xerochrept in northern Syria. In a tillage systems trial involving two wheat–legume–watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus ) rotations, deep tillage showed no advantage over a shallow sweep-tillage system, either for soil moisture storage or yield increase of any crop. The zero-till system suited legume crops but gave lower productivity in wheat due to a build up of grassy weeds, and was not suitable for watermelon. Minimum tillage, with its higher energy-use efficiency and yield levels equal to or even slightly above those of deep-tillage systems, appears promising for the lowland areas of West Asia and North Africa. In a tillage timing trial, wheat in a wheat–lentil ( Lens culinaris ) rotation yielded best after conventional deep disc-plough tillage, but lentil yields were higher in a zero-till system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage showed no advantage over a shallow sweep-tillage system for soil moisture storage or yield increase of any crop.

Taxon
any crope1
Treatment
deep tillagee1
Outcome
soil moisture storage or yield increasee1
Direction
no advantagee1
Comparator
shallow sweep-tillage systeme1

Verbatim

e1

“deep tillage showed no advantage over a shallow sweep-tillage system, either for soil moisture storage or yield increase of any crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zero-till system suited legume crops.

Taxon
legume cropse1
Treatment
The zero-till systeme1
Outcome
suitede1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The zero-till system suited legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zero-till system gave lower wheat productivity due to a build up of grassy weeds.

Treatment
The zero-till systeme2
Interactor
grassy weedse1weed
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
due to a build up of grassy weedse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“gave lower productivity in wheat due to a build up of grassy weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–705 · show in text ↑
e2

“The zero-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zero-till system was not suitable for watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
The zero-till systeme2
Outcome
not suitablee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“was not suitable for watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–742 · show in text ↑
e2

“The zero-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage had higher energy-use efficiency than deep-tillage systems.

Treatment
Minimum tillagee1
Outcome
energy-use efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
deep-tillage systemse1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“Minimum tillage, with its higher energy-use efficiency and yield levels equal to or even slightly above those of deep-tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage gave yield levels equal to or even slightly above those of deep-tillage systems.

Treatment
Minimum tillagee1
Outcome
yield levelse1
Direction
equal to or even slightly abovee1
Comparator
deep-tillage systemse1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“Minimum tillage, with its higher energy-use efficiency and yield levels equal to or even slightly above those of deep-tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–877 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage appears promising for the lowland areas of West Asia and North Africa.

Treatment
Minimum tillagee1
Outcome
appears promisinge2
Setting
lowland areas of West Asia and North Africae2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“Minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–759 · show in text ↑
e2

“appears promising for the lowland areas of West Asia and North Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a tillage timing trial, wheat in a wheat-lentil rotation yielded best after conventional deep disc-plough tillage.

Treatment
conventional deep disc-plough tillagee1
Outcome
yieldede1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat in a wheat–lentil ( Lens culinaris ) rotation yielded best after conventional deep disc-plough tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil yields were higher in a zero-till system in the tillage timing trial.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
zero-till systeme1
Outcome
lentil yieldse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“lentil yields were higher in a zero-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1138 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.