Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Manual samples showed lentil grain yield fell 87 to 95% under intercropping.

A claim from Grain Yield and Weed Biomass of a Wheat–Lentil Intercrop · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual samples showed lentil grain yield fell 87 to 95% under intercropping.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
87 to 95%e0
Qualifier
samples harvested manuallye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced grain yield of lentil by 87 to 95% when yield estimates were based on samples harvested manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–940

Title

Grain Yield and Weed Biomass of a Wheat–Lentil Intercrop

Patrick M. Carr; John J. Gardner; Blaine G. Schatz; et al. Agronomy Journal 1995. doi:10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700030030x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-2f896f61d6bbc848e5d18c701cb93ed31d43bbf49bfa501d2f9b45014c1e7144 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.