Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

A zinc, copper and citric acid biocomplex shows promise for control of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in olive trees in Apulia region (southern Italy)

Marco SCORTICHINI; Jianchi CHEN; Monica DE CAROLI; et al.

4
claims
14
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The bacterium Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca is associated with the “olive quick decline syndrome” in the Apulia region of southern Italy. To investigate control of this phytopathogen, a compound containing zinc and copper complexed with citric-acid hydracids (Dentamet®) was evaluated for in vitro and in planta bactericidal activity. Confocal laser scanning microscopy, fluorescent quantification and atomic emission spectroscopy were then used to determine if the compound reached the xylem networks of leaves, twigs and branches of olive, to release zinc and copper within the xylem. A 3-year field trial in an olive orchard containing mature Cellina di Nardò and Ogliarola salentina olive trees, and officially declared infected by X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca,was also carried out o to determine if the compound affected severity of the disease. Each year, from early April to October (excluding July and August), six spray treatments of 0.5% (v:v) Dentamet® were applied on the olive tree crowns. The compound reduced severity of symptoms in both cultivars. Most untreated trees died by the end of the trial, whereas all treated trees survived with good vegetative status as assessed by a normalized difference vegetation index. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed from June 2016 to September 2017, following the official procedures established by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. The analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction of X. fastidiosa cell densities within the leaves of treated trees. These promising results suggest that integrated management to reduce severity of X. fastidiosa that includes regular pruning and soil harrowing with spring and summer spray treatments with Dentamet®, is likely to effectively control the disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray treatments with Dentamet reduced the severity of Xylella symptoms in both olive cultivars.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
six spray treatments of 0.5% (v:v) Dentamet®e2
Interactor
Xylella fastidiosa subsp. paucaXylella fastidiosa subsp. paucae0pathogen
Outcome
severity of symptomse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
untreated treese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca
Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca · Interactor · picture of the speciesValentain12 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterium Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca is associated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“The compound reduced severity of symptoms in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1062 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each year, from early April to October (excluding July and August), six spray treatments of 0.5% (v:v) Dentamet® were applied on the olive tree crowns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1001 · show in text ↑
e3

“Most untreated trees died by the end of the trial, whereas all treated trees survived”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“for control of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treated olive trees survived the trial, while most untreated trees died.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
six spray treatments of 0.5% (v:v) Dentamet®e2
Outcome
survivede3
Qualifier
good vegetative status as assessed by a normalized difference vegetation indexe3
Comparator
untreated treese3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Each year, from early April to October (excluding July and August), six spray treatments of 0.5% (v:v) Dentamet® were applied on the olive tree crowns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1001 · show in text ↑
e3

“Most untreated trees died by the end of the trial, whereas all treated trees survived with good vegetative status as assessed by a normalized difference vegetation index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“for control of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated olive trees showed a statistically significant reduction in X. fastidiosa cell densities in the leaves.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Material
Cellina di Nardòe4
Treatment
six spray treatments of 0.5% (v:v) Dentamet®e2
Interactor
X. fastidiosaXylella fastidiosae5pathogen
Outcome
X. fastidiosa cell densitiese5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xylella fastidiosa
Xylella fastidiosa · InteractorValentain12 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“A 3-year field trial in an olive orchard containing mature Cellina di Nardò and Ogliarola salentina olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–700 · show in text ↑
e5

“The analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction of X. fastidiosa cell densities within the leaves of treated trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1547 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each year, from early April to October (excluding July and August), six spray treatments of 0.5% (v:v) Dentamet® were applied on the olive tree crowns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“for control of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest integrated management with spray treatments is likely to control the disease effectively.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Outcome
control the diseasee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“These promising results suggest that integrated management to reduce severity of X. fastidiosa that includes regular pruning and soil harrowing with spring and summer spray treatments with Dentamet®, is likely to effectively control the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“for control of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca in olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–117 · show in text ↑

application · Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Xylella fastidiosa · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.