Paper · 2018 · Weed Technology

Suppression of Glyphosate-resistant Canada Fleabane (Conyza canadensis) in Corn with Cover Crops Seeded after Wheat Harvest the Previous Year

Taïga B. Cholette; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Glyphosate-resistant (GR) and multiple herbicide–resistant (groups 2 and 9) Canada fleabane have been confirmed in 30 and 23 counties in Ontario, respectively. The widespread incidence of herbicide-resistant Canada fleabane highlights the importance of developing integrated weed management strategies. One strategy is to suppress Canada fleabane using cover crops. Seventeen different cover crop monocultures or polycultures were seeded after winter wheat harvest in late summer to determine GR Canada fleabane suppression in corn grown the following growing season. All cover crop treatments seeded after wheat harvest suppressed GR Canada fleabane in corn the following year. At 4 wk after cover crop emergence (WAE), estimated cover crop ground cover ranged from 31% to 68%, a density of 124 to 638 plants m –2 , and a range of biomass from 29 to 109 g m –2 , depending on cover crop species. All of the cover crop treatments suppressed GR Canada fleabane in corn grown the following growing season from May to September compared to the no cover crop control. Among treatments evaluated, annual ryegrass (ARG), crimson clover (CC)/ARG, oilseed radish (OSR)/CC/ARG, and OSR/CC/cereal rye (CR) were the best treatments for the suppression of GR Canada fleabane in corn. ARG alone or in combination with CC provided the most consistent GR Canada fleabane suppression, density reduction, and biomass reduction in corn. Grain corn yields were not affected by the use of the cover crops evaluated for Canada fleabane suppression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cover crop treatments seeded after wheat harvest suppressed GR Canada fleabane in corn compared with no cover crop.

Treatment
cover crop treatments seeded after wheat harveste1
Interactor
Canada fleabanee1weed
Outcome
GR Canada fleabanee1
Direction
suppressede1
Comparator
no cover crop controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All cover crop treatments seeded after wheat harvest suppressed GR Canada fleabane in corn the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–686 · show in text ↑
e2

“All of the cover crop treatments suppressed GR Canada fleabane in corn grown the following growing season from May to September compared to the no cover crop control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1071 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops reached an estimated ground cover of 31% to 68% at 4 weeks after emergence.

Taxon
cover crope3
Outcome
estimated cover crop ground covere3
Value
31% to 68%e3
Qualifier
At 4 wk after cover crop emergence (WAE)e3

Verbatim

e3

“At 4 wk after cover crop emergence (WAE), estimated cover crop ground cover ranged from 31% to 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops reached a density of 124 to 638 plants per m2 at 4 weeks after emergence.

Taxon
cover crope3
Outcome
densitye4
Value
124 to 638 plants m –2e4
Qualifier
At 4 wk after cover crop emergence (WAE)e3

Verbatim

e3

“At 4 wk after cover crop emergence (WAE), estimated cover crop ground cover ranged from 31% to 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–786 · show in text ↑
e4

“a density of 124 to 638 plants m –2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–823 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops reached a biomass of 29 to 109 g per m2 at 4 weeks after emergence.

Taxon
cover crope3
Outcome
biomasse5
Value
29 to 109 g m –2e5
Qualifier
At 4 wk after cover crop emergence (WAE)e3

Verbatim

e3

“At 4 wk after cover crop emergence (WAE), estimated cover crop ground cover ranged from 31% to 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–786 · show in text ↑
e5

“a range of biomass from 29 to 109 g m –2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual ryegrass, crimson clover/ARG and oilseed radish/CC/ARG were the best cover crop treatments for suppressing GR Canada fleabane in corn.

Treatment
annual ryegrass (ARG), crimson clover (CC)/ARG, oilseed radish (OSR)/CC/ARGe6
Interactor
GR Canada fleabanee6weed
Outcome
suppression of GR Canada fleabanee6
Direction
beste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Among treatments evaluated, annual ryegrass (ARG), crimson clover (CC)/ARG, oilseed radish (OSR)/CC/ARG, and OSR/CC/cereal rye (CR) were the best treatments for the suppression of GR Canada fleabane in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1279 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OSR/CC/cereal rye was one of the best cover crop treatments for suppressing GR Canada fleabane in corn.

Treatment
OSR/CC/cereal rye (CR)e6
Interactor
GR Canada fleabanee6weed
Outcome
suppression of GR Canada fleabanee6
Direction
beste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Among treatments evaluated, annual ryegrass (ARG), crimson clover (CC)/ARG, oilseed radish (OSR)/CC/ARG, and OSR/CC/cereal rye (CR) were the best treatments for the suppression of GR Canada fleabane in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1279 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual ryegrass alone or with crimson clover gave the most consistent suppression, density reduction and biomass reduction of GR Canada fleabane in corn.

Treatment
ARG alone or in combination with CCe7
Interactor
GR Canada fleabanee7weed
Outcome
GR Canada fleabane suppression, density reduction, and biomass reductione7
Direction
most consistente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“ARG alone or in combination with CC provided the most consistent GR Canada fleabane suppression, density reduction, and biomass reduction in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cover crops did not affect grain corn yields.

Taxon
Grain corne1
Treatment
the cover crops evaluated for Canada fleabane suppressione1
Outcome
Grain corn yieldse1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Grain corn yields were not affected by the use of the cover crops evaluated for Canada fleabane suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1535 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.