Paper · 2007 · Plant Soil and Environment

The influence of gypsum treatment on the acquirement of nutrients from soils by barley

J. Matula; M. Pechová

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The aim of the present paper was to determine the impact of gypsum treatment of soils on initial growth and nutrient uptake by spring barley. Topsoil from 36 different farmed fields was used for the research. Two variants were established for each soil: control - without gypsum application, and response variant - with the application of 3.3 ppm CaSO4.2 H2O. Barley was grown on these soils for 21 days in a plant growth chamber under controlled conditions of cultivation. Concentrations of nutrients (N, NO3-, P, S, K, Mg, Ca, Na, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B and Mo) were determined in the yield of barley shoot biomass. Paired t-test was used for the evaluation of results. After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass was significantly higher (by 15% on average) and nitrogen utilisation was better on all soils. The concentration of sulphur increased five times on average and Ca concentration increased by 22%. Significant increases were measured in Mg, Mn and Cu. Insignificant differences were recorded in K, Na, Fe and Zn. The uptake of anion nutrients (P, B and Mo) was influenced significantly. The concentration of P and Mo decreased on average by 28% and 31%, respectively. B concentration was higher by 10% on average.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum raised barley shoot biomass yield by 15% on average.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente0
Outcome
yield of barley shoot biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass was significantly higher (by 15% on average) and nitrogen utilisation was better on all soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum improved barley nitrogen utilisation on all soils.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente0
Outcome
nitrogen utilisatione0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
on all soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass was significantly higher (by 15% on average) and nitrogen utilisation was better on all soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased shoot sulphur concentration fivefold on average.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente1
Outcome
concentration of sulphure0
Direction
increasede0
Value
five timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of sulphur increased five times on average and Ca concentration increased by 22%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased shoot Ca concentration by 22%.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente1
Outcome
Ca concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of sulphur increased five times on average and Ca concentration increased by 22%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum significantly increased Mg, Mn, and Cu concentrations.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente1
Outcome
Mg, Mn and Cue0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases were measured in Mg, Mn and Cu.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum produced statistically insignificant differences in K, Na, Fe, and Zn concentrations.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente1
Outcome
K, Na, Fe and Zne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insignificant differences were recorded in K, Na, Fe and Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum decreased P concentration by 28% on average.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente1
Outcome
concentration of Pe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of P and Mo decreased on average by 28% and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum decreased Mo concentration by 31% on average.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente1
Outcome
Moe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of P and Mo decreased on average by 28% and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased B concentration by 10% on average.

Treatment
gypsum treatmente1
Outcome
B concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B concentration was higher by 10% on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“After the gypsum treatment the yield of barley shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–727 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

54 papers: 53 positive, 1 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

lime · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.