Paper · 1970 · Journal of Medicinal Herbs and Ethnomedicine

Allelopathic effects for three plants extracts on weeds of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Hussein Ali Salim, Abdalsalam Awni Abdalbaki; Hussein Ali Khalid ,Hana Safi Eshak, Balkees Reski; Wissam Kahtan Alwan

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An investigation was carried out to evaluate the allelopathic effects of aqueous extracts of Eucalyptus obligo, Chrysanthemum indicum and Eruca sativa on weeds of wheat in the research field of Kanan region, province of Diyala, Iraq during 2016-2017. A minimum number of weeds and Dry weight of weeds were significantly recorded (3.3 m-2, 15 g) respectively in Eruca sativa extract while maximum control of weeds % and inhibition of weeds % (71.2, 87.5%) were significantly recorded in Eruca sativa extract. Different yield components of wheat, such as crop height and 1000-grain weight showed maximum significantly difference 109.0 cm and 42.9 g respectively in Eucalyptus obligo whereas spike length, number of grains / spike, number of plants / m2 and grain yield revealed maximum significantly difference 11.8 cm, 52.6, 341and 1568 g respectively in Chrysanthemum indicum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eruca sativa extract gave minimum weed number of 3.3 m-2.

Treatment
Eruca sativa extracte0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weedse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.3 m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A minimum number of weeds and Dry weight of weeds were significantly recorded (3.3 m-2, 15 g) respectively in Eruca sativa extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eruca sativa extract gave minimum weed dry weight of 15 g.

Treatment
Eruca sativa extracte0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
Dry weight of weedse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
15 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A minimum number of weeds and Dry weight of weeds were significantly recorded (3.3 m-2, 15 g) respectively in Eruca sativa extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eruca sativa extract gave maximum weed control of 71.2%.

Treatment
Eruca sativa extracte0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weeds %e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
71.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum control of weeds % and inhibition of weeds % (71.2, 87.5%) were significantly recorded in Eruca sativa extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eruca sativa extract gave maximum weed inhibition of 87.5%.

Treatment
Eruca sativa extracte0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
inhibition of weeds %e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
87.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum control of weeds % and inhibition of weeds % (71.2, 87.5%) were significantly recorded in Eruca sativa extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus obligo gave maximum wheat crop height of 109.0 cm.

Treatment
Eucalyptus obligoe0
Outcome
crop heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
109.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop height and 1000-grain weight showed maximum significantly difference 109.0 cm and 42.9 g respectively in Eucalyptus obligo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus obligo gave maximum wheat 1000-grain weight of 42.9 g.

Treatment
Eucalyptus obligoe0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
42.9 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop height and 1000-grain weight showed maximum significantly difference 109.0 cm and 42.9 g respectively in Eucalyptus obligo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum indicum gave maximum spike length of 11.8 cm.

Treatment
Chrysanthemum indicume0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.8 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, number of grains / spike, number of plants / m2 and grain yield revealed maximum significantly difference 11.8 cm, 52.6, 341and 1568 g respectively in Chrysanthemum indicum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum indicum gave maximum grains per spike of 52.6.

Treatment
Chrysanthemum indicume0
Outcome
number of grains / spikee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
52.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, number of grains / spike, number of plants / m2 and grain yield revealed maximum significantly difference 11.8 cm, 52.6, 341and 1568 g respectively in Chrysanthemum indicum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum indicum gave maximum plants per square metre of 341.

Treatment
Chrysanthemum indicume0
Outcome
number of plants / m2e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
341e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, number of grains / spike, number of plants / m2 and grain yield revealed maximum significantly difference 11.8 cm, 52.6, 341and 1568 g respectively in Chrysanthemum indicum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum indicum gave maximum grain yield of 1568 g.

Treatment
Chrysanthemum indicume0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1568 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, number of grains / spike, number of plants / m2 and grain yield revealed maximum significantly difference 11.8 cm, 52.6, 341and 1568 g respectively in Chrysanthemum indicum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

Eucalyptus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Eucalyptus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

botanical · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 56 positive, 17 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.