Paper · 2015 · University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen)

Yield responses of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to different agrotechnical factors

Karamchand Bramdeo

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper present information on the yield responses of three hybrids of maize, Armagnac, Renfor and Neffel to different agrotechnical treatments under the prevailing climatic condition of the specific crop year- 2013/2014. The different agro-technical conditions, include three tillage treatments, three levels of N-fertilizer treatments, two levels of plant densities, irrigated and non-irrigated, monoculture maize and maize-winter wheat biculture. The experiment was set up in a split-plot design, as is part of an ongoing long-term polyfactorial experiment at Látókép Research Station, Debrecen, Hungary • Yield ranged from 7.12 tons/ ha to 11.64 tons/ ha. The highest yield was obtained in autumn plowing, 70,000 plants/ ha , 240 N-kg/ ha , irrigated and in maize-winter wheat biculture. • The best performing hybrid was Armagnac followed by Neffel and Renfor respectively. • N-120 kg/ ha was found to be the most economical and environmentally sound level. • Yield of maize was significantly influenced in increasing order by irrigation, hybrid, plant density, forecrop and fertilization. Tillage was not found to have any significant effect on the yield of maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield ranged from 7.12 to 11.64 tons per ha across treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Yielde0
Value
7.12 tons/ ha to 11.64 tons/ hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield ranged from 7.12 tons/ ha to 11.64 tons/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest maize yield was obtained with autumn plowing, 70,000 plants per ha, 240 kg N per ha, irrigation and maize-winter wheat biculture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
autumn plowing, 70,000 plants/ ha , 240 N-kg/ ha , irrigated and in maize-winter wheat biculturee0
Outcome
highest yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was obtained in autumn plowing, 70,000 plants/ ha , 240 N-kg/ ha , irrigated and in maize-winter wheat biculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best performing hybrid was Armagnac, followed by Neffel and Renfor.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Armagnace0
Outcome
best performing hybride0
Qualifier
followed by Neffel and Renfore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best performing hybrid was Armagnac followed by Neffel and Renfor respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–879 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N-120 kg per ha was found to be the most economical and environmentally sound N level for maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N-120 kg/ hae0
Outcome
most economical and environmentally sound levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“N-120 kg/ ha was found to be the most economical and environmentally sound level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield was significantly influenced, in increasing order, by irrigation, hybrid, plant density, forecrop and fertilization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
irrigation, hybrid, plant density, forecrop and fertilizatione0
Outcome
Yield of maizee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of maize was significantly influenced in increasing order by irrigation, hybrid, plant density, forecrop and fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage had no significant effect on maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Tillagee0
Outcome
yield of maizee0
Direction
not found to have any significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage was not found to have any significant effect on the yield of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1171 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.