Abstract
This paper present information on the yield responses of three hybrids of maize, Armagnac, Renfor and Neffel to different agrotechnical treatments under the prevailing climatic condition of the specific crop year- 2013/2014. The different agro-technical conditions, include three tillage treatments, three levels of N-fertilizer treatments, two levels of plant densities, irrigated and non-irrigated, monoculture maize and maize-winter wheat biculture. The experiment was set up in a split-plot design, as is part of an ongoing long-term polyfactorial experiment at Látókép Research Station, Debrecen, Hungary • Yield ranged from 7.12 tons/ ha to 11.64 tons/ ha. The highest yield was obtained in autumn plowing, 70,000 plants/ ha , 240 N-kg/ ha , irrigated and in maize-winter wheat biculture. • The best performing hybrid was Armagnac followed by Neffel and Renfor respectively. • N-120 kg/ ha was found to be the most economical and environmentally sound level. • Yield of maize was significantly influenced in increasing order by irrigation, hybrid, plant density, forecrop and fertilization. Tillage was not found to have any significant effect on the yield of maize.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield ranged from 7.12 to 11.64 tons per ha across treatments.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“Yield ranged from 7.12 tons/ ha to 11.64 tons/ ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest maize yield was obtained with autumn plowing, 70,000 plants per ha, 240 kg N per ha, irrigation and maize-winter wheat biculture.
- Treatment
- autumn plowing, 70,000 plants/ ha , 240 N-kg/ ha , irrigated and in maize-winter wheat biculturee0
- Outcome
- highest yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was obtained in autumn plowing, 70,000 plants/ ha , 240 N-kg/ ha , irrigated and in maize-winter wheat biculture”
Claim · model-written summary
The best performing hybrid was Armagnac, followed by Neffel and Renfor.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“The best performing hybrid was Armagnac followed by Neffel and Renfor respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
N-120 kg per ha was found to be the most economical and environmentally sound N level for maize.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“N-120 kg/ ha was found to be the most economical and environmentally sound level”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was significantly influenced, in increasing order, by irrigation, hybrid, plant density, forecrop and fertilization.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yield of maize was significantly influenced in increasing order by irrigation, hybrid, plant density, forecrop and fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage had no significant effect on maize yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tillage was not found to have any significant effect on the yield of maize”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.