Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of foliar applied nutrients on soil chemical properties and nutrient uptake of baby corn (Zea mays L.)

Prajwal Kumar Gk; B. S. Lalitha; Somashekar Ks; et al.

1
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Zonal Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra, Bengaluru during kharif 2016 to study the effect of foliar application of macro and micro nutrients on chemical properties of baby corn (Zea mays L.). The experiment was laid out in a Randomised Complete Block Design with nine treatments replicated thrice. The higher nutrient uptake was noticed with foliar application of 75% RDF + 1.5% 19:19:19 spray + 0.2% ZnSO4 + 0.1% FeSO4 (208.09 kg N ha-1, 43.60 kg P2O5 ha-1, 227.91 kg K2O ha-1, 6.98 mg Zn kg-1 and 9.65 mg Iron kg-1, respectively) and was on par with application of 75% RDF + 1.5% 19:19:19 spray + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.1% FeSO4 (208.09 kg N ha-1, 43.60 kg P2O5 ha-1, 227.91 kg K2O ha-1, 6.98 mg Zn kg-1 and 9.65 mg Iron kg-1, respectively) compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 75% RDF with 1.5% 19:19:19, 0.5% ZnSO4 and 0.1% FeSO4 gave nutrient uptake on par with the 0.2% ZnSO4 spray in baby corn

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
application of 75% RDF + 1.5% 19:19:19 spray + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.1% FeSO4e4
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
on pare4
Comparator
75% RDF + 1.5% 19:19:19 spray + 0.2% ZnSO4 + 0.1% FeSO4e1

Verbatim

e1

“The higher nutrient uptake was noticed with foliar application of 75% RDF + 1.5% 19:19:19 spray + 0.2% ZnSO4 + 0.1% FeSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–518 · show in text ↑
e4

“was on par with application of 75% RDF + 1.5% 19:19:19 spray + 0.5% ZnSO4 + 0.1% FeSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“nutrient uptake of baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 151 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.