Abstract
Abstract The effect of salicylic acid (SA) on antioxidant enzymes activities in wheat infected with Mycosphaerella graminicola was investigated. Different concentrations of SA (0 and 2mM) were sprayed on susceptible and tolerant cultivars of wheat at a two-leaf stage. Enhanced activities of peroxidase, catalase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, and polyphenoloxidase were determined in two wheat SA-treated cultivars in the presence or absence of pathogen. The results showed that the application of SA was more effective on antioxidant activities than pathogen. However, the highest activities of all tested enzymes were detected in cultivars treated both with SA and pathogen. Although in the earliest time of infection the antioxidant enzymes activities in susceptible cultivar were weaker than in the tolerant cultivar, the enzymes activity enhancement by SA in susceptible cultivar was observable, too. These results suggest SA as plant defense inducer could be an effective agent against M. graminicola in wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid enhanced peroxidase, catalase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity in both cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- SA-treatede0
- Interactor
- pathogene0pathogen
- Outcome
- activities of peroxidase, catalase, phenylalanine ammonia lyasee0
- Direction
- Enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Enhanced activities of peroxidase, catalase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, and polyphenoloxidase were determined in two wheat SA-treated cultivars in the presence or absence of pathogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid enhanced polyphenoloxidase activity in both cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- SA-treatede0
- Interactor
- pathogene0pathogen
- Outcome
- polyphenoloxidasee0
- Direction
- Enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Enhanced activities of peroxidase, catalase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, and polyphenoloxidase were determined in two wheat SA-treated cultivars in the presence or absence of pathogen”
Claim · model-written summary
SA had a greater effect on antioxidant activity than the pathogen alone.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- application of SAe0
- Interactor
- Mycosphaerella Graminicola
Zymoseptoria triticit0pathogene0 - Outcome
- antioxidant activitiese0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- pathogene0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the application of SA was more effective on antioxidant activities than pathogen”
t0“Effect of Salicylic Acid on Enzyme Activity in Wheat in Immediate Early Time after Infection with Mycosphaerella Graminicola”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined SA and pathogen treatment produced the highest activity for all tested enzymes.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- treated both with SA and pathogene0
- Interactor
- Mycosphaerella Graminicola
Zymoseptoria triticit0pathogene0 - Outcome
- activities of all tested enzymese0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the highest activities of all tested enzymes were detected in cultivars treated both with SA and pathogen”
t0“Effect of Salicylic Acid on Enzyme Activity in Wheat in Immediate Early Time after Infection with Mycosphaerella Graminicola”
Claim · model-written summary
Early antioxidant enzyme activity was weaker in susceptible than tolerant wheat.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- susceptible cultivare0
- Interactor
- Mycosphaerella Graminicola
Zymoseptoria triticit0pathogene0 - Outcome
- antioxidant enzymes activitiese0
- Direction
- weakere0
- Comparator
- tolerant cultivare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“in the earliest time of infection the antioxidant enzymes activities in susceptible cultivar were weaker than in the tolerant cultivar”
t0“Effect of Salicylic Acid on Enzyme Activity in Wheat in Immediate Early Time after Infection with Mycosphaerella Graminicola”
Claim · model-written summary
SA also enhanced enzyme activity in the susceptible cultivar.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- susceptible cultivare0
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- enzymes activitye0
- Direction
- enhancemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the enzymes activity enhancement by SA in susceptible cultivar was observable, too”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest SA as a defense inducer against M. graminicola in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- SAe0
- Interactor
- M. graminicola
Zymoseptoria triticie0pathogen - Outcome
- plant defense inducere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“SA as plant defense inducer could be an effective agent against M. graminicola in wheat”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
60 papers more in this group
See all 64 papers →salicylic acid · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
salicylic acid · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.