Paper · 2018 · Folia Forestalia Polonica

The dynamics of sprouts generation and colonization by macrofungi of black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh. eliminated mechanically in the Kampinos National Park

Katarzyna Marciszewska; Andrzej Szczepkowski; Anna Otręba; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The experiment conducted in the Kampinos National Park since 2015 is aimed at investigating the relationship between the dynamics of black cherry sprouting response and the type and term of implementation of the mechanical elimination procedure. It also identifies macrofungi colonizing trees undergoing eradication. Three treatments, basal cut-stump, cutting (height: ca. 1 m) and girdling, were performed on 4 terms: early and late spring, summer and winter. Each variant was conducted within two plots, and applied to 25 trees, to 600 trees in total. For two consecutive vegetation seasons, sprouts were removed approximately every 8 weeks with the exception of winter-treated trees. Qualitative data were analysed, that is, the number of trees with and without sprouts at subsequent controls, and at the end of the second season, except winter-treated trees. Initially, almost 100% of the trees cut at the base and cut high responded by sprouting. The share of trees without sprouts gradually increased during the following vegetation season, from 3 rd to 5 th repetition of the sprouts removal, depending on the variant of experiment. Girdling contributed to a delay in sprouting. The effectiveness of procedures, expressed as share of trees without sprouts at the end of the second vegetation season, ranged widely (12%–84%), and depended statistically significantly on the date of the treatment. The effectiveness was higher for treatments done in early (average 68%) and late spring (average 74%), as compared to those done in summer (average 35%). Mycological research concerned 600 trees, including those treated in winter, without sprouts removal. Occurrence of 26 taxa of macrofungi was confirmed on 25% of trees; most of them having wood-decaying properties. Chondrostereum purpureum was most frequent, colonizing 9% of trees. Impact of plots varying soil moisture on succession and rate of fungi colonization, and on sprouting response dynamics requires further research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initially, almost 100% of trees cut at the base or cut high sprouted.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Treatment
cut at the base and cut highe1
Outcome
sproutinge1
Value
almost 100%e1
Qualifier
Initiallye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Initially, almost 100% of the trees cut at the base and cut high responded by sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling delayed sprouting.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Treatment
Girdlinge2
Outcome
sproutinge2
Direction
delaye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Girdling contributed to a delay in sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effectiveness of the elimination procedures ranged widely, from 12% to 84%.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Outcome
effectivenesse3
Value
12%–84%e3
Qualifier
expressed as share of trees without sprouts at the end of the second vegetation seasone3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effectiveness of procedures, expressed as share of trees without sprouts at the end of the second vegetation season, ranged widely (12%–84%), and depended statistically significantly on the date of the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1410 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Effectiveness of the elimination procedures depended significantly on the date of treatment.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Treatment
date of the treatmente3
Outcome
effectivenesse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effectiveness of procedures, expressed as share of trees without sprouts at the end of the second vegetation season, ranged widely (12%–84%), and depended statistically significantly on the date of the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments done in early spring were more effective (average 68%) than those done in summer.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Treatment
treatments done in earlye4
Outcome
effectivenesse4
Direction
highere4
Value
average 68%e4
Comparator
those done in summere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effectiveness was higher for treatments done in early (average 68%) and late spring (average 74%), as compared to those done in summer (average 35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments done in late spring were more effective (average 74%) than those done in summer.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Treatment
late springe4
Outcome
effectivenesse4
Direction
highere4
Value
average 74%e4
Comparator
those done in summere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effectiveness was higher for treatments done in early (average 68%) and late spring (average 74%), as compared to those done in summer (average 35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1564 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments done in summer had an average effectiveness of 35%.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Treatment
those done in summere4
Outcome
effectivenesse4
Value
average 35%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effectiveness was higher for treatments done in early (average 68%) and late spring (average 74%), as compared to those done in summer (average 35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1564 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The share of trees without sprouts gradually increased over the following vegetation season.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Outcome
share of trees without sproutse5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
graduallye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e5

“The share of trees without sprouts gradually increased during the following vegetation season, from 3 rd to 5 th repetition of the sprouts removal, depending on the variant of experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrofungi of 26 taxa were confirmed on black cherry trees, most of them wood-decaying.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Interactor
macrofungie6other
Outcome
taxa of macrofungie6
Value
26 taxae6
Qualifier
most of them having wood-decaying propertiese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e6

“Occurrence of 26 taxa of macrofungi was confirmed on 25% of trees; most of them having wood-decaying properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrofungi occurred on 25% of black cherry trees.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Interactor
macrofungie6other
Outcome
Occurrencee6
Value
25% of treese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e6

“Occurrence of 26 taxa of macrofungi was confirmed on 25% of trees; most of them having wood-decaying properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chondrostereum purpureum was the most frequent colonizer, colonizing 9% of trees.

Taxon
black cherryPrunus serotinat0
Interactor
Chondrostereum purpureumChondrostereum purpureume7other
Outcome
colonizinge7
Value
9% of treese7
Qualifier
most frequente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus serotina
Prunus serotina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chondrostereum purpureum
Chondrostereum purpureum · InteractorUser:Strobilomyces · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“black cherry Prunus serotina Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
e7

“Chondrostereum purpureum was most frequent, colonizing 9% of trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1847 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: postharvest · Prunus serotina (black cherry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.