Abstract
Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the viability of liquid medium inoculation of Rhizobium etli in the planting furrow and to certify the efficiency of its strain UFLA 02-100 as a potential inoculant for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). The treatments consisted of three application rates of liquid inoculant applied in the planting furrows or in common bean seed, besides two controls without inoculation. The inoculant contained 109 cells of Rhizobium etli mL-1. Regardless of the application method, the yield obtained with the inoculation was equivalent to that of N from urea; however, the application in the furrows, at 0.6 L ha-1, is more advantageous due to the operational practicality and reduced costs.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Common bean yield with Rhizobium etli inoculation was equivalent to yield with nitrogen from urea regardless of application method.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise1 - Treatment
- inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Rhizobium etliRhizobium etlie2symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- equivalente0
- Comparator
- N from ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regardless of the application method, the yield obtained with the inoculation was equivalent to that of N from urea”
e1“inoculant for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”
e2“Rhizobium etli in the planting furrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying Rhizobium etli in planting furrows at 0.6 L ha-1 was judged more advantageous because of practicality and lower costs.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
- Interactor
- Rhizobium etliRhizobium etlie2symbiont
- Outcome
- application in the furrows, at 0.6 L ha-1e0
- Direction
- more advantageouse0
- Qualifier
- operational practicality and reduced costse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application in the furrows, at 0.6 L ha-1, is more advantageous due to the operational practicality and reduced costs”
e1“inoculant for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”
e2“Rhizobium etli in the planting furrow”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Rhizobium etli · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.