Abstract
In Florida, cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L.) is typically grown without a plastic mulch and as a result, weeds are a significant problem in most fields. Experiments were conducted from Nov. 2015 to Apr. 2016 in Balm, Citra, and Parrish, FL, to evaluate weed control and ‘Bravo’ cabbage tolerance to multiple herbicide programs applied pretransplanting (PRE-T), posttransplanting (POST-T), PRE-T followed by (fb) a sequential application at 3 weeks after transplanting (WATP), and POST-T fb sequential application at 3 WATP. PRE-T herbicide treatments of 277 g a.i./ha clomazone, 280 g a.i./ha oxyfluorfen, and 798 g a.i./ha pendimethalin and POST-T herbicide treatments of 6715 g a.i./ha dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) were ineffective, and weed control never exceeded 70% in Balm and provided <50% weed control in Citra and Parrish at 6 and 8 WATP, respectively. POST-T applications of napropamide + S-metolachlor at 2242 + 1770 g a.i./ha, DCPA + S-metolachlor at 6715 + 1170 g a.i./ha, and S-metolachlor POST-T fb clopyralid at 1170 g a.i./ha fb 210 g ae/ha were the most effective herbicide treatments and consistently provided >70% weed control. In addition, results showed that all of the herbicide treatments evaluated except the PRE application of clomazone at 277 g a.i./ha are safe for cabbage with no adverse effect on yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant clomazone at 277 g a.i./ha was ineffective for weed control.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae1 - Treatment
- 277 g a.i./ha clomazonee0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRE-T herbicide treatments of 277 g a.i./ha clomazone, 280 g a.i./ha oxyfluorfen, and 798 g a.i./ha pendimethalin and POST-T herbicide treatments of 6715 g a.i./ha dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) were ineffective, and weed control never exceeded 70% in Balm”
e1“cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant oxyfluorfen at 280 g a.i./ha was ineffective for weed control.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- 280 g a.i./ha oxyfluorfene0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRE-T herbicide treatments of 277 g a.i./ha clomazone, 280 g a.i./ha oxyfluorfen, and 798 g a.i./ha pendimethalin and POST-T herbicide treatments of 6715 g a.i./ha dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) were ineffective, and weed control never exceeded 70% in Balm”
e1“cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant pendimethalin at 798 g a.i./ha was ineffective for weed control.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- 798 g a.i./ha pendimethaline0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRE-T herbicide treatments of 277 g a.i./ha clomazone, 280 g a.i./ha oxyfluorfen, and 798 g a.i./ha pendimethalin and POST-T herbicide treatments of 6715 g a.i./ha dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) were ineffective, and weed control never exceeded 70% in Balm”
e1“cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Posttransplant DCPA at 6715 g a.i./ha was ineffective for weed control.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- 6715 g a.i./ha dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA)e0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“POST-T herbicide treatments of 6715 g a.i./ha dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) were ineffective, and weed control never exceeded 70% in Balm”
e1“cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
These ineffective treatments did not exceed 70% weed control in Balm.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“weed control never exceeded 70% in Balm”
Claim · model-written summary
These ineffective treatments provided less than 50% weed control in Citra at six weeks after transplanting.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“provided <50% weed control in Citra and Parrish at 6 and 8 WATP, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
These ineffective treatments provided less than 50% weed control in Parrish at eight weeks after transplanting.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“provided <50% weed control in Citra and Parrish at 6 and 8 WATP, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Posttransplant napropamide plus S-metolachlor consistently provided more than 70% weed control.
- Treatment
- napropamide + S-metolachlor at 2242 + 1770 g a.i./hae0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Value
- >70%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“POST-T applications of napropamide + S-metolachlor at 2242 + 1770 g a.i./ha, DCPA + S-metolachlor at 6715 + 1170 g a.i./ha, and S-metolachlor POST-T fb clopyralid at 1170 g a.i./ha fb 210 g ae/ha were the most effective herbicide treatments and consistently provided >70% weed control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Posttransplant DCPA plus S-metolachlor consistently provided more than 70% weed control.
- Treatment
- DCPA + S-metolachlor at 6715 + 1170 g a.i./hae0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Value
- >70%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“POST-T applications of napropamide + S-metolachlor at 2242 + 1770 g a.i./ha, DCPA + S-metolachlor at 6715 + 1170 g a.i./ha, and S-metolachlor POST-T fb clopyralid at 1170 g a.i./ha fb 210 g ae/ha were the most effective herbicide treatments and consistently provided >70% weed control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Posttransplant S-metolachlor followed by clopyralid consistently provided more than 70% weed control.
- Treatment
- S-metolachlor POST-T fb clopyralid at 1170 g a.i./ha fb 210 g ae/hae0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Value
- >70%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“POST-T applications of napropamide + S-metolachlor at 2242 + 1770 g a.i./ha, DCPA + S-metolachlor at 6715 + 1170 g a.i./ha, and S-metolachlor POST-T fb clopyralid at 1170 g a.i./ha fb 210 g ae/ha were the most effective herbicide treatments and consistently provided >70% weed control.”
Claim · model-written summary
All evaluated herbicide treatments except pretransplant clomazone were safe for cabbage yield.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no adverse effecte0
- Qualifier
- except the PRE application of clomazone at 277 g a.i./hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all of the herbicide treatments evaluated except the PRE application of clomazone at 277 g a.i./ha are safe for cabbage with no adverse effect on yield.”
The same questions in other papers
clomazone · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
pendimethalin · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
Oxyfluorfen · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →napropamide · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
clopyralid · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.