Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Farm Sciences

Effect of Biomix inoculation and chemical fertilizers on phenology of some pearl millet hybrids

Yamank Yamank; Meena Sewhag; Priti Malik; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was laid out during Kharif 2016 at research area of Department of Agronomy, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana to study the effect of Biomix inoculation and chemical fertilizers on phenology of various pearl millet hybrids. Application of nitrogen had no significant effect on phenological development of pearl millet genotypes. Various combinations of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and Biomix inoculation also failed to influence any of the phenological stages (like emergence, five leaf stage, flag leaf stage, boot stage and 50% flowering) of pearl millet hybrids. Hybrid H2 (HHB 197) took significantly less number of days to 50 per cent flowering, milk stage, dough stage and physiological maturity as compared to other two hybrids (HHB 234 and HHB 223). Pearl millet hybrid H2 (HHB 197) attained physiological maturity 3 days earlier than hybrid H1(HHB234).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen had no significant effect on pearl millet phenological development.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Application of nitrogene0
Outcome
phenological developmente0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen had no significant effect on phenological development of pearl millet genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and Biomix combinations failed to influence emergence, five leaf stage and flag leaf stage.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Various combinations of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and Biomix inoculatione0
Interactor
Biomixe0symbiont
Outcome
emergence, five leaf stage, flag leaf stagee0
Direction
failed to influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Various combinations of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and Biomix inoculation also failed to influence any of the phenological stages (like emergence, five leaf stage, flag leaf stage, boot stage and 50% flowering) of pearl millet hybrids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and Biomix combinations failed to influence boot stage and 50% flowering.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Various combinations of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and Biomix inoculatione0
Interactor
Biomixe0symbiont
Outcome
boot stage and 50% floweringe0
Direction
failed to influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Various combinations of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and Biomix inoculation also failed to influence any of the phenological stages (like emergence, five leaf stage, flag leaf stage, boot stage and 50% flowering) of pearl millet hybrids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–626 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HHB 197 required significantly fewer days to flowering, milk stage and dough stage than HHB 234 and HHB 223.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
HHB 197e0
Outcome
50 per cent flowering, milk stage, dough stagee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
HHB 234 and HHB 223e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid H2 (HHB 197) took significantly less number of days to 50 per cent flowering, milk stage, dough stage and physiological maturity as compared to other two hybrids (HHB 234 and HHB 223).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HHB 197 reached physiological maturity significantly sooner than HHB 234 and HHB 223, including three days earlier than HHB234.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Material
HHB 197e1
Outcome
physiological maturitye1
Direction
earliere1
Value
3 dayse1
Comparator
HHB234e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid H2 (HHB 197) took significantly less number of days to 50 per cent flowering, milk stage, dough stage and physiological maturity as compared to other two hybrids (HHB 234 and HHB 223).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pearl millet hybrid H2 (HHB 197) attained physiological maturity 3 days earlier than hybrid H1(HHB234).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–922 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 68 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.