Abstract
A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India under All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture. The experiment was laid out with ten Integrated Nutrient Management Treatments in a randomized block design with three replications. The results of the study indicated that among all the integrated nutrient management treatments practiced, the application of 25 kg nitrogen (N) ha−1 through crop residue (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) showed the highest soil quality index of 2.36, which was at par with other treatments receiving farmyard manure (FYM) and crop residues along with urea. The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77). The results of the study also indicated that average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%). Thus, the results of the present study will be highly useful to the land managers in planning effective management of soil quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 25 kg N ha−1 through crop residue plus 25 kg N ha−1 as urea gave the highest soil quality index (2.36) in sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolore1 - Treatment
- the application of 25 kg nitrogen (N) ha−1 through crop residue (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea)e2
- Outcome
- soil quality indexe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 2.36e2
- Comparator
- other treatments receiving farmyard manure (FYM) and crop residues along with ureae2
- Setting
- Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western Indiae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“the application of 25 kg nitrogen (N) ha−1 through crop residue (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) showed the highest soil quality index of 2.36, which was at par with other treatments receiving farmyard manure (FYM) and crop residues along with urea”
Claim · model-written summary
pH contributed 3.97% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 3.97%e2
- Qualifier
- pHe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
EC contributed 1.94% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 1.94%e2
- Qualifier
- ECe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
organic carbon contributed 18.6% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 18.6%e2
- Qualifier
- organic carbone2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
available P contributed 2.80% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 2.80%e2
- Qualifier
- available Pe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
available K contributed 6.57% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 6.57%e2
- Qualifier
- available Ke2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
exchangeable Ca contributed 7.02% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 7.02%e2
- Qualifier
- exchangeable Cae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
available S contributed 3.45% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 3.45%e2
- Qualifier
- available Se2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Available Zn contributed 17.9% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 17.9%e2
- Qualifier
- Available Zne2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
DHA contributed 16.2% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 16.2%e2
- Qualifier
- DHAe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
microbial biomass carbon contributed 18.5% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 18.5%e2
- Qualifier
- microbial biomass carbone2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
mean weight diameter contributed 3.14% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Outcome
- average percent contributione2
- Value
- 3.14%e2
- Qualifier
- mean weight diametere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T5 gave soil quality index 2.31 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 2.31e2
- Qualifier
- soil qualitye2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 gave soil quality index 2.30 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 2.30e2
- Qualifier
- T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T10 gave soil quality index 2.17 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 2.17e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T4 gave soil quality index 2.16 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 2.16e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 gave soil quality index 2.15 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 2.15e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T3 gave soil quality index 2.10 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 50 kg N ha−1 (urea)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 2.10e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 gave soil quality index 1.99 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 25 kg N ha−1 (urea)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 1.99e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T1 gave soil quality index 1.77 in the relative order of performance under sorghum.
- Taxon
- Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- 0 kg N ha−1 (control)e2
- Outcome
- soil qualitye2
- Value
- 1.77e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”
e2“The relative order of performance of the integrated nutrient management treatments in influencing soil quality was: T6: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) + 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.36) >T5: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) (2.31) > T7: 25 kg N ha−1 (FYM) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.30) = T8: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR) +25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.30) > T10: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) +25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.17) > T4: 25 kg N ha−1 (CR:crop residues) (2.16) > T9: 25 kg N ha−1 (Leucaena loppings) (2.15) > T3: 50 kg N ha−1 (urea) (2.10) > T2: 25 kg N ha−1 (urea) (1.99) > T1: 0 kg N ha−1 (control) (1.77)”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: general · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.