Observationmodel-written summary

Available Zn contributed 17.9% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.

A claim from Effect of Predominant Integrated Nutrient Management Practices on Soil Quality Indicators and Soil Quality Indices under Post Monsoon (Rabi) Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor) in Rainfed Black Soils (Vertisols) of Western India · 2018

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available Zn contributed 17.9% on average to the soil quality indices under sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
average percent contributione2
Value
17.9%e2
Qualifier
Available Zne2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A long-term study was conducted to study the impact of integrated nutrient management on soil quality in post-monsoon sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at Solapur in Maharashtra State in Western India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–192
e2

“average percent contribution of each soil key indicator towards soil quality indices was: pH (3.97%), EC (1.94%), organic carbon (18.6%), available P (2.80%), available K (6.57%), exchangeable Ca (7.02%), available S (3.45%), Available Zn (17.9%), dehydrogenase (DHA) (16.2%), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (18.5%) and mean weight diameter (MWD) (3.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1723

Title

Effect of Predominant Integrated Nutrient Management Practices on Soil Quality Indicators and Soil Quality Indices under Post Monsoon (Rabi) Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor) in Rainfed Black Soils (Vertisols) of Western India

K.L. Sharma; Ch. SrinivasaRao; D. Suma Chandrika; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2018. doi:10.1080/00103624.2018.1474901

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-dd30caa31d28fa3112210aef1b2a07ed58d87595dd52466e531c44eb39b5e674 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer