Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Bio-Efficacy of insecticides against sucking pests; Jassid and Thrips infesting tomato

V. U. Bambhaniya; AV Khanpara; H M Patel

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out to study the bio-efficacy of different insecticides against sucking pests; whitefly and aphid infesting tomato at instructional farm, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-Gujarat during the prevailing year 2017. The results from the three sprays on whitefly have revealed that imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, difenthiuron 0.05per cent, acetamiprid 0.008 per cent and thiacloprid 0.024 per cent were found to be the most effective insecticides. The results of relative efficacy of nine different insecticides against aphid have revealed that flonicamid 0.015 per cent, imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, clothianidin 0.025 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent gave very good results against aphid. The highest cost benefit ratio (1:77.51) was obtained from the treatment of imidacloprid 0.005 followed by acetamiprid 0.008 per cent (1:74.83), dimethoate 0.03 per cent (1:74.06) and flonicamid 0.015 per cent (1:26.80). Other insecticides register lower yield and economic. Significantly higher yield of 15278 kg/ ha was recorded from plots protected against the sucking pests of tomato while yield of 11620 kg/ ha was recorded from the unprotected plots. The increase in yield in protected plots over unprotected plots was found to

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide was among the most effective against whitefly.

Treatment
imidacloprid 0.005 per cente0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results from the three sprays on whitefly have revealed that imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, difenthiuron 0.05per cent, acetamiprid 0.008 per cent and thiacloprid 0.024 per cent were found to be the most effective insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide was among the most effective against whitefly.

Treatment
difenthiuron 0.05per cente0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results from the three sprays on whitefly have revealed that imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, difenthiuron 0.05per cent, acetamiprid 0.008 per cent and thiacloprid 0.024 per cent were found to be the most effective insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide was among the most effective against whitefly.

Treatment
acetamiprid 0.008 per cente0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results from the three sprays on whitefly have revealed that imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, difenthiuron 0.05per cent, acetamiprid 0.008 per cent and thiacloprid 0.024 per cent were found to be the most effective insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide was among the most effective against whitefly.

Treatment
thiacloprid 0.024 per cente0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results from the three sprays on whitefly have revealed that imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, difenthiuron 0.05per cent, acetamiprid 0.008 per cent and thiacloprid 0.024 per cent were found to be the most effective insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide gave very good results against aphid.

Treatment
flonicamid 0.015 per cente0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
results against aphide0
Direction
very goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of relative efficacy of nine different insecticides against aphid have revealed that flonicamid 0.015 per cent, imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, clothianidin 0.025 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent gave very good results against aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide gave very good results against aphid.

Treatment
imidacloprid 0.005 per cente0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
results against aphide0
Direction
very goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of relative efficacy of nine different insecticides against aphid have revealed that flonicamid 0.015 per cent, imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, clothianidin 0.025 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent gave very good results against aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide gave very good results against aphid.

Treatment
clothianidin 0.025 per cente0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
results against aphide0
Direction
very goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of relative efficacy of nine different insecticides against aphid have revealed that flonicamid 0.015 per cent, imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, clothianidin 0.025 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent gave very good results against aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide gave very good results against aphid.

Treatment
dimethoate 0.03 per cente0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
results against aphide0
Direction
very goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of relative efficacy of nine different insecticides against aphid have revealed that flonicamid 0.015 per cent, imidacloprid 0.005 per cent, clothianidin 0.025 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent gave very good results against aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide produced the reported cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
imidacloprid 0.005e0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:77.51e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cost benefit ratio (1:77.51) was obtained from the treatment of imidacloprid 0.005 followed by acetamiprid 0.008 per cent (1:74.83), dimethoate 0.03 per cent (1:74.06) and flonicamid 0.015 per cent (1:26.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide produced the reported cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
acetamiprid 0.008 per cente0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Value
1:74.83e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cost benefit ratio (1:77.51) was obtained from the treatment of imidacloprid 0.005 followed by acetamiprid 0.008 per cent (1:74.83), dimethoate 0.03 per cent (1:74.06) and flonicamid 0.015 per cent (1:26.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide produced the reported cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
dimethoate 0.03 per cente0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Value
1:74.06e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cost benefit ratio (1:77.51) was obtained from the treatment of imidacloprid 0.005 followed by acetamiprid 0.008 per cent (1:74.83), dimethoate 0.03 per cent (1:74.06) and flonicamid 0.015 per cent (1:26.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named insecticide produced the reported cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
flonicamid 0.015 per cente0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Value
1:26.80e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cost benefit ratio (1:77.51) was obtained from the treatment of imidacloprid 0.005 followed by acetamiprid 0.008 per cent (1:74.83), dimethoate 0.03 per cent (1:74.06) and flonicamid 0.015 per cent (1:26.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other insecticides had lower yield and economic results.

Treatment
Other insecticidese0
Outcome
yield and economice0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other insecticides register lower yield and economic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest protected plots yielded 15278 kg/ ha versus 11620 kg/ ha in unprotected plots.

Treatment
protected against the sucking pestse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15278 kg/ hae0
Qualifier
11620 kg/ hae0
Comparator
unprotected plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher yield of 15278 kg/ ha was recorded from plots protected against the sucking pests of tomato while yield of 11620 kg/ ha was recorded from the unprotected plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1211 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

flonicamid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dimethoate · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    The root treatment and spray sequence produced higher tomato fruit yield than the seed treatment sequence.

    Evaluation of insecticides against whitefly on tomato and their effect on natural enemies · 2018 · compared with seed treatment done with Imidaclorprid 70 WS @ 3g/kg of seed and 2 sprays done with Dimethoate 30 EC @1.5ml/L water

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

acetamiprid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.