Paper · 2014 · Horticultura Brasileira

Doses of carnauba leaf residues and corn yield

Paulo Sérgio Lima e Silva; Paulo Igor Barbosa e Silva; Vianney Reinaldo de Oliveira; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Corn yield can be increased with the application of doses of residues from perennial plant species. Many growers in Northeastern Brazil use carnauba (a palm tree native to that region) leaf residues to address deficiencies in soils that are poor in organic matter. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of application of carnauba leaf residue doses on the green ear yields of two corn cultivars. Additionally, we also evaluated corn grain yield. Six doses of leaf residues (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg ha -1 ) were applied in the sowing furrows of two corn cultivars (AG 1051 and BR 106). A completely randomized block design with five replicates and split-plots were used (doses in plots). Increased doses of leaf residues resulted in higher total numbers of green ears and higher numbers and weight of marketable unhusked green ears (BR 106), and higher total green ear weight, marketable husked green ear weight, and grain yield (AG 1051 and BR 106). However, the application of carnauba leaf residues did not influence the total number of green ears, number of marketable unhusked ears, unhusked ear weight (AG 1051), and number of marketable husked ears (AG 1051 and BR 106). Cultivar BR 106 was superior to cultivar AG 1051 in total number of green ears and number of marketable unhusked green ears, while the opposite occurred for green ear weight and grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing leaf residue doses increased total green ear number and marketable unhusked ear number and weight in BR 106.

Material
BR 106e0
Treatment
Increased doses of leaf residuese0
Outcome
total numbers of green ears and higher numbers and weight of marketable unhusked green earse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased doses of leaf residues resulted in higher total numbers of green ears and higher numbers and weight of marketable unhusked green ears (BR 106)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing leaf residue doses increased total green ear weight, marketable husked ear weight and grain yield in both cultivars.

Material
AG 1051 and BR 106e0
Treatment
leaf residuese1
Outcome
total green ear weight, marketable husked green ear weight, and grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher total green ear weight, marketable husked green ear weight, and grain yield (AG 1051 and BR 106)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased doses of leaf residues resulted in higher total numbers of green ears and higher numbers and weight of marketable unhusked green ears (BR 106)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf residue application did not influence total green ear number, marketable unhusked ear number or unhusked ear weight in AG 1051.

Material
AG 1051e0
Treatment
application of carnauba leaf residuese0
Outcome
total number of green ears, number of marketable unhusked ears, unhusked ear weighte0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of carnauba leaf residues did not influence the total number of green ears, number of marketable unhusked ears, unhusked ear weight (AG 1051)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf residue application did not influence marketable husked ear number in either cultivar.

Material
AG 1051 and BR 106e0
Treatment
application of carnauba leaf residuese0
Outcome
number of marketable husked earse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of carnauba leaf residues did not influence the total number of green ears, number of marketable unhusked ears, unhusked ear weight (AG 1051), and number of marketable husked ears (AG 1051 and BR 106)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR 106 exceeded AG 1051 in total green ear number and marketable unhusked green ear number.

Material
BR 106e0
Outcome
total number of green ears and number of marketable unhusked green earse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
AG 1051e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar BR 106 was superior to cultivar AG 1051 in total number of green ears and number of marketable unhusked green ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AG 1051 exceeded BR 106 in green ear weight and grain yield.

Material
AG 1051e0
Outcome
green ear weight and grain yielde0
Direction
the oppositee0
Comparator
BR 106e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar BR 106 was superior to cultivar AG 1051 in total number of green ears and number of marketable unhusked green ears, while the opposite occurred for green ear weight and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1385 · show in text ↑