Abstract
The soil application of microfood/ straight micronutrients recorded higher brinjal fruit yield compared to the foliar application. The highest fruit yield was recorded by the combined application of stanes microfood (soil), composted coirpith and Azospirillum. The yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo. The application of NPK alone recorded a lower yield of 174.41 g plant and the control recorded the lowest yield of 159.0 g plant-1
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Soil micronutrients produced higher fruit yield than foliar application.
- Taxon
- brinjal
Solanum melongenae0 - Treatment
- soil application of microfood/ straight micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- brinjal fruit yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- foliar applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“soil application of microfood/ straight micronutrients recorded higher brinjal fruit yield compared to the foliar application”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined microfood, coirpith and Azospirillum gave the highest yield.
- Treatment
- combined application of stanes microfood (soil), composted coirpith and Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest fruit yield was recorded by the combined application of stanes microfood (soil), composted coirpith and Azospirillum”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil microfood with NPK increased yield by 20.0 percent over NPK.
- Treatment
- stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPKe0
- Outcome
- yield increasee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 20.0e0
- Comparator
- NPKe0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo”
Claim · model-written summary
SMF with NPK and CCP increased yield by 25.6 percent over NPK.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo”
Claim · model-written summary
MF with NPK, CCP and Azo increased yield by 32.1 percent over NPK.
- Treatment
- MF with NPK + CCP+ Azoe0
- Outcome
- yield increasee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 32.1 per cente0
- Comparator
- NPKe0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK alone yielded 174.41 g plant.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“NPK alone recorded a lower yield of 174.41 g plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Control yield was lowest at 159.0 g plant-1.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“control recorded the lowest yield of 159.0 g plant-1”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.