Paper · 2000 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Effect of micronutrient fertilization on brinjal fruit yield in an alfisol

SELVI D; RANI PERUMAL

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The soil application of microfood/ straight micronutrients recorded higher brinjal fruit yield compared to the foliar application. The highest fruit yield was recorded by the combined application of stanes microfood (soil), composted coirpith and Azospirillum. The yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo. The application of NPK alone recorded a lower yield of 174.41 g plant and the control recorded the lowest yield of 159.0 g plant-1

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil micronutrients produced higher fruit yield than foliar application.

Treatment
soil application of microfood/ straight micronutrientse0
Outcome
brinjal fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of microfood/ straight micronutrients recorded higher brinjal fruit yield compared to the foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microfood, coirpith and Azospirillum gave the highest yield.

Treatment
combined application of stanes microfood (soil), composted coirpith and Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest fruit yield was recorded by the combined application of stanes microfood (soil), composted coirpith and Azospirillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microfood with NPK increased yield by 20.0 percent over NPK.

Treatment
stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPKe0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.0e0
Comparator
NPKe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMF with NPK and CCP increased yield by 25.6 percent over NPK.

Treatment
SMF with NPK + CCPe0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25.6e0
Comparator
NPKe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF with NPK, CCP and Azo increased yield by 32.1 percent over NPK.

Treatment
MF with NPK + CCP+ Azoe0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.1 per cente0
Comparator
NPKe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“yield increase was 20.0, 25.6 and 32.1 per cent over NPK respectively for the application of stanes microfood (soil applied) with NPK / SMF with NPK + CCP / MF with NPK + CCP+ Azo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK alone yielded 174.41 g plant.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
174.41 g plante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“NPK alone recorded a lower yield of 174.41 g plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–515 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control yield was lowest at 159.0 g plant-1.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
159.0 g plant-1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“control recorded the lowest yield of 159.0 g plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–576 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 74 positive, 3 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.