Paper · 1992 · Nematologia mediterranea

THE SYNERGISM OF SOIL SOLARIZATION WITH FUMIGANT NEMATICIDES AND STRAW FOR THE CONTROL OF HETERODERA CAROTAE AND DITYLENCHUS DIPSACI

Nancy M. Greco; T. D’Addabbo; V. Stea; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The synergism of soil solarization with applications of reduced rates of 1,3 D and dazomet and soil incorporation of wheat straw on the control of Heterodera carotae on carrot and Ditylenchus dipsaci on onion was investigated in 1990-1991 in six field trials in Italy. Fumigations with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha followed by four or eight week solarization periods improved the control of H. carotae compared with either method alone, resulting in the near eradication of the nematode from the top 30 cm soil and suppression of carrot feeder root infestation. Significant increases in carrot yields were obtained with 50 1 1,3 D/ha in combination with soil solarization. Similar levels of egg mortality of H, carotae were obtained by a combination of soil application of 50 or 100 kg dazomet/ha and soil solarization, although the treatment had no effect on carrot yield and root infestation. More onion plants survived Ditylenchus dipsaci infestation and larger marketable yields of onions were obtained with a combination of soil solarization with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha. Except for an application of 50 kg dazometh followed by eight week solarization, both solarization periods and all rates of dazomet, alone or in combination, fenamiphos at 10 kg/ha and 1,3 D at 250 l/ha suppressed nematode infestation and increased onion yield. Soil incorporation of 5 and 10 t wheat strawha, or 5 t straw/ha followed by eight week solarization, also reduced nematode infestation and increased onion yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 1,3 D and solarization improved control of H. carotae over either alone.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae1
Treatment
25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha followed by four or eight week solarization periodse0
Interactor
H. carotaeHeterodera carotaee0pathogen
Outcome
control of H. carotaee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
either method alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigations with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha followed by four or eight week solarization periods improved the control of H. carotae compared with either method alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heterodera carotae on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination nearly eradicated nematodes from topsoil.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
Fumigations with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha followed by four or eight week solarization periodse1
Interactor
Heterodera carotaeHeterodera carotaee2pathogen
Outcome
nematode from the top 30 cm soile0
Direction
near eradicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in the near eradication of the nematode from the top 30 cm soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–501 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigations with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha followed by four or eight week solarization periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–357 · show in text ↑
e2

“Heterodera carotae on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination suppressed carrot feeder root infestation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Fumigations with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha followed by four or eight week solarization periodse1
Interactor
Heterodera carotaeHeterodera carotaee2pathogen
Outcome
carrot feeder root infestatione0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suppression of carrot feeder root infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–551 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigations with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha followed by four or eight week solarization periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–357 · show in text ↑
e2

“Heterodera carotae on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50 1 1,3 D/ha with solarization significantly increased carrot yield.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
50 1 1,3 D/ha in combination with soil solarizatione0
Outcome
carrot yieldse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in carrot yields were obtained with 50 1 1,3 D/ha in combination with soil solarization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dazomet with solarization gave similar H. carotae egg mortality.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae1
Treatment
soil application of 50 or 100 kg dazomet/ha and soil solarizatione0
Interactor
H, carotaee0pathogen
Outcome
egg mortality of H, carotaee0
Direction
Similar levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar levels of egg mortality of H, carotae were obtained by a combination of soil application of 50 or 100 kg dazomet/ha and soil solarization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heterodera carotae on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dazomet plus solarization had no effect on carrot yield or root infestation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
combination of soil application of 50 or 100 kg dazomet/ha and soil solarizatione1
Outcome
carrot yield and root infestatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment had no effect on carrot yield and root infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of soil application of 50 or 100 kg dazomet/ha and soil solarization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization with 1,3 D increased survival of onion plants under D. dipsaci infestation.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
combination of soil solarization with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/hae0
Interactor
Ditylenchus dipsaciDitylenchus dipsacie0pathogen
Outcome
onion plants survived Ditylenchus dipsaci infestatione0
Direction
Moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ditylenchus dipsaci
Ditylenchus dipsaci · InteractorLen Worthington · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More onion plants survived Ditylenchus dipsaci infestation and larger marketable yields of onions were obtained with a combination of soil solarization with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization with 1,3 D increased marketable onion yield.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
combination of soil solarization with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/hae0
Interactor
Ditylenchus dipsaciDitylenchus dipsacie0pathogen
Outcome
marketable yields of onionse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ditylenchus dipsaci
Ditylenchus dipsaci · InteractorLen Worthington · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More onion plants survived Ditylenchus dipsaci infestation and larger marketable yields of onions were obtained with a combination of soil solarization with 25 or 50 1 1,3 D/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most listed solarization and nematicide treatments increased onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
both solarization periods and all rates of dazomet, alone or in combination, fenamiphos at 10 kg/ha and 1,3 D at 250 l/hae0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both solarization periods and all rates of dazomet, alone or in combination, fenamiphos at 10 kg/ha and 1,3 D at 250 l/ha suppressed nematode infestation and increased onion yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw incorporation reduced onion nematode infestation.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Soil incorporation of 5 and 10 t wheat strawha, or 5 t straw/ha followed by eight week solarizatione0
Outcome
nematode infestatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil incorporation of 5 and 10 t wheat strawha, or 5 t straw/ha followed by eight week solarization, also reduced nematode infestation and increased onion yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw incorporation increased onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Soil incorporation of 5 and 10 t wheat strawha, or 5 t straw/ha followed by eight week solarizatione0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil incorporation of 5 and 10 t wheat strawha, or 5 t straw/ha followed by eight week solarization, also reduced nematode infestation and increased onion yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1486 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Triticum aestivum · pest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dazomet · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fenamiphos · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

solarization · Heterodera carotae · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · pest · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · pest · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.