Abstract
The data of 2016-2017 studies on effectiveness of different oat cultivation technologies including ways of basic and pre-sowing soil tilling and using of bio-preparations on sod-podzolic soils of Kirov region are provided. Ploughing and surface soil tillage, cultivation and tilling with combined soil-tillage sowing machine, as well as preparation on the basis of S. hygroscopicus A4 strain and Pseudobacterin-2 were studied in the experiment. Storage of productive moisture in soil layer of 0-20 cm was 25.2-29.5 mm before sowing; there were no differences in the ways of soil tilling. The density of 0-20 cm soil layer was 0.05-0.06 g/cm 3 higher in variants with surface tillage. Application of combined aggregate APPN-2.1 provided “excellent” structure state of arable layer, the content of agronomical valuable particles was 82.284.4% at the soil structure coefficient equal to 4.7-5.5. Sowing dockage was significantly lower in variants of plowing (41.3 psc./m 2 , LSD 05 =2.8) than in surface tillage (44.5 psc./m 2 ). In variants with use of Pseudobacterin-2 preparation the sowing dockage increased too up to 50.1 psc. /m 2 (LSD 05 = 7.2) as compared to the variants without preparations (38.1 psc./m 2 ) and with the use of preparation on the base of S. hygroscopicus A4 strain (40.5 psc./m 2 ). Up to 31.6% of oat plants were affected with root rot in variants without preparations; by application of preparations on the base of S. hygroscopicus strain A4 the affection decreased to 11.3%; by application of Pseudobacterin-2 preparation - to 10.5% (LSD 05 = 3.9). The affection of oat plants with leaf rust was insignificant; the preparations significantly decreased this factor from 8.6 to 3.1-3.9% (LSD 05 = 1.7). On the average, for two years of study the highest productivity was noted in the variant of ploughing with using the combined sowing unit APPN-2.1 by application of preparation on the base of S. hygroscopicus strain A4 (1 l/ha) - 3.92 t/ha that is 1.01 t/ha higher then control variant, ploughing with KPS-4 pre-sowing tilling without preparations. The level of total profitability of oat grain production was 136.1%, the factor of energy effectiveness was 3.05 (in control variant - 84.4% and 2.34 correspondingly).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture before sowing was 25.2–29.5 mm and did not differ by tillage method.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativat0 - Outcome
- Storage of productive moisturee0
- Value
- 25.2-29.5 mme0
- Qualifier
- before sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Storage of productive moisture in soil layer of 0-20 cm was 25.2-29.5 mm before sowing; there were no differences in the ways of soil tilling.”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Surface tillage had soil density 0.05–0.06 g/cm 3 higher.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- surface tillagee0
- Outcome
- density of 0-20 cm soil layere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.05-0.06 g/cm 3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The density of 0-20 cm soil layer was 0.05-0.06 g/cm 3 higher in variants with surface tillage.”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
APPN-2.1 produced an excellent arable soil structure.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- combined aggregate APPN-2.1e0
- Outcome
- “excellent” structure state of arable layere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of combined aggregate APPN-2.1 provided “excellent” structure state of arable layer”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
APPN-2.1 produced 82.284.4% agronomically valuable particles.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- combined aggregate APPN-2.1e0
- Outcome
- content of agronomical valuable particlese0
- Value
- 82.284.4%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of combined aggregate APPN-2.1 provided “excellent” structure state of arable layer, the content of agronomical valuable particles was 82.284.4%”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
APPN-2.1 yielded a soil structure coefficient of 4.7–5.5.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- cultivation technologyt0
- Outcome
- soil structure coefficiente0
- Value
- 4.7-5.5e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the content of agronomical valuable particles was 82.284.4% at the soil structure coefficient equal to 4.7-5.5.”
t0“oat cultivation technology”
Claim · model-written summary
Ploughing had lower sowing dockage than surface tillage, 41.3 versus 44.5 psc./m 2.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- plowinge0
- Outcome
- Sowing dockagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 41.3 psc./m 2e0
- Qualifier
- 44.5 psc./m 2e0
- Comparator
- surface tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sowing dockage was significantly lower in variants of plowing (41.3 psc./m 2 , LSD 05 =2.8) than in surface tillage (44.5 psc./m 2 ).”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudobacterin-2 increased sowing dockage to 50.1 psc./m 2 versus no preparation.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- Pseudobacterin-2 preparatione0
- Outcome
- sowing dockagee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 50.1 psc. /m 2e0
- Qualifier
- 38.1 psc./m 2e0
- Comparator
- without preparationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In variants with use of Pseudobacterin-2 preparation the sowing dockage increased too up to 50.1 psc. /m 2 (LSD 05 = 7.2) as compared to the variants without preparations (38.1 psc./m 2 )”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
The S. hygroscopicus preparation had 40.5 psc./m 2 sowing dockage, below Pseudobacterin-2.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- preparation on the base of S. hygroscopicus A4 straine0
- Outcome
- 40.5 psc./m 2e0
- Value
- 40.5 psc./m 2e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the use of preparation on the base of S. hygroscopicus A4 strain (40.5 psc./m 2 ).”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Without preparations, root rot affected up to 31.6% of oat plants.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Outcome
- affected with root rote0
- Value
- 31.6%e0
- Qualifier
- without preparationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Up to 31.6% of oat plants were affected with root rot in variants without preparations”
Claim · model-written summary
S. hygroscopicus strain A4 preparation reduced root rot affection to 11.3%.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- preparations on the base of S. hygroscopicus strain A4e0
- Outcome
- affectione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 11.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by application of preparations on the base of S. hygroscopicus strain A4 the affection decreased to 11.3%”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudobacterin-2 reduced root rot affection to 10.5%.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- Pseudobacterin-2 preparatione0
- Outcome
- 10.5%e0
- Value
- 10.5%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by application of Pseudobacterin-2 preparation - to 10.5% (LSD 05 = 3.9).”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
The preparations significantly reduced leaf rust affection from 8.6% to 3.1–3.9%.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- preparationse0
- Outcome
- this factore0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 3.1-3.9%e0
- Qualifier
- 8.6e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the preparations significantly decreased this factor from 8.6 to 3.1-3.9% (LSD 05 = 1.7).”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Ploughing with APPN-2.1 and S. hygroscopicus A4 gave the highest oat productivity, 3.92 t/ha, 1.01 t/ha above control.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- ploughing with using the combined sowing unit APPN-2.1 by application of preparation on the base of S. hygroscopicus strain A4 (1 l/ha)e0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.92 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1.01 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control variant, ploughing with KPS-4 pre-sowing tilling without preparationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest productivity was noted in the variant of ploughing with using the combined sowing unit APPN-2.1 by application of preparation on the base of S. hygroscopicus strain A4 (1 l/ha) - 3.92 t/ha that is 1.01 t/ha higher then control variant, ploughing with KPS-4 pre-sowing tilling without preparations.”
t0“oat cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Total profitability was 136.1% versus 84.4% in control.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Outcome
- total profitability of oat grain productione0
- Value
- 136.1%e0
- Qualifier
- 84.4%e0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The level of total profitability of oat grain production was 136.1%, the factor of energy effectiveness was 3.05 (in control variant - 84.4% and 2.34 correspondingly).”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy effectiveness was 3.05 versus 2.34 in control.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Outcome
- factor of energy effectivenesse0
- Value
- 3.05e0
- Qualifier
- 2.34e0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The level of total profitability of oat grain production was 136.1%, the factor of energy effectiveness was 3.05 (in control variant - 84.4% and 2.34 correspondingly).”
t0“oat cultivation”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.