Abstract
In pot and field experiments carried out in 1979-1981, the systemic funqicide hymexazol prevented satisfactorily soil borne damping-off of sugar beet caused mainly by the fungus Pythium debaryanum auct. non Hesse. The results with the combination hymexazol + thiram were still better. This treatment gave very good protection against the disease up to about two to three weeks after emergence, increased the yield on the average by 5-10 % and produced considerably thicker and denser stands. Thereafter a large number of beets may have become infected, but no great damage was caused as only few died. Band spraying at emergence using hymexazol with a large amount of water as well as spraying into the seed furrow prevented the outbreak of the disease almost completely. Liming had little effect on damping-off.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Systemic fungicide hymexazol prevented soil-borne damping-off of sugar beet caused by Pythium debaryanum.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- systemic funqicide hymexazole1
- Interactor
- Pythium debaryanum auct. non Hesse
Globisporangium debaryanume1pathogen - Outcome
- soil borne damping-off of sugar beete1
- Direction
- preventede1
- Setting
- pot and field experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e0“In pot and field experiments carried out in 1979-1981”
e1“the systemic funqicide hymexazol prevented satisfactorily soil borne damping-off of sugar beet caused mainly by the fungus Pythium debaryanum auct. non Hesse”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination hymexazol plus thiram gave better results than the treatments compared.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- combination hymexazol + thirame2
- Outcome
- resultse2
- Direction
- bettere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e2“The results with the combination hymexazol + thiram were still better”
Claim · model-written summary
The hymexazol plus thiram treatment gave very good protection against the disease up to two to three weeks after emergence.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- This treatmente3
- Outcome
- protection against the diseasee3
- Qualifier
- up to about two to three weeks after emergencee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e3“This treatment gave very good protection against the disease up to about two to three weeks after emergence, increased the yield on the average by 5-10 % and produced considerably thicker and denser stands”
Claim · model-written summary
The hymexazol plus thiram treatment increased sugar beet yield by 5-10%.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- This treatmente3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 5-10 %e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e3“This treatment gave very good protection against the disease up to about two to three weeks after emergence, increased the yield on the average by 5-10 % and produced considerably thicker and denser stands”
Claim · model-written summary
The hymexazol plus thiram treatment produced thicker and denser sugar beet stands.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- This treatmente3
- Outcome
- standse3
- Direction
- thicker and densere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e3“This treatment gave very good protection against the disease up to about two to three weeks after emergence, increased the yield on the average by 5-10 % and produced considerably thicker and denser stands”
Claim · model-written summary
Beets may have become infected after the early protection period, but little damage resulted.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- beetse4
- Qualifier
- may have become infected, but no great damage was caused as only few diede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e4“Thereafter a large number of beets may have become infected, but no great damage was caused as only few died”
Claim · model-written summary
Band spraying at emergence with hymexazol in a large amount of water prevented the outbreak of the disease almost completely.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Band spraying at emergence using hymexazol with a large amount of watere5
- Outcome
- outbreak of the diseasee5
- Direction
- preventede5
- Qualifier
- almost completelye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e5“Band spraying at emergence using hymexazol with a large amount of water as well as spraying into the seed furrow prevented the outbreak of the disease almost completely”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying into the seed furrow prevented the outbreak of sugar beet damping-off almost completely.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- spraying into the seed furrowe5
- Outcome
- outbreak of the diseasee5
- Direction
- preventede5
- Qualifier
- almost completelye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e5“Band spraying at emergence using hymexazol with a large amount of water as well as spraying into the seed furrow prevented the outbreak of the disease almost completely”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming had little effect on damping-off.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Liminge6
- Outcome
- damping-offe6
- Direction
- little effecte6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Damping-off of sugar beet”
e6“Liming had little effect on damping-off”
The same questions in other papers
lime · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.