Abstract
Abstract Coexistence and diversity in plant communities depend upon outcomes of plant competition. Competition and coexistence can be mediated by abiotic soil nutrient differences as well as by soil microbial communities. The latter effects occur through various mechanisms including negative plant–soil feedbacks, when plants foster the build‐up of specialized pathogenic microbes, which ultimately reduce conspecific, but not heterospecific, densities. Microbial mutualists can have generalized associations with host plants, and by associating with multiple species might affect coexistence by conferring different levels of benefit to hosts. We examined the effects of abiotic differences and soil microbial communities, including mutualistic nitrogen‐fixing rhizobial bacteria, on coexistence processes and asked whether these interactions inform patterns of co‐occurrence in natural communities. We measured plant–soil feedbacks in the greenhouse for three native Trifolium species that either highly co‐occurred or were spatially repulsed at our field site. Using size‐fractioned soil microbial inocula prepared from field‐collected soils, we explored the effect of soil microbes on nodulation and the outcome of competition (relative interaction intensity). We also examined the effects of soil origin (home vs. away soil) on the outcome of competition between species. Soil microbes had strong positive effects on plant growth and nodulation. Microbes in general reduced the strength of plant competition relative to competition in sterilized soil and altered the relative strength of interactions with conspecific vs. congeneric neighbours, which often occurred in ways predicted to enhance coexistence. In one pair of highly co‐occurring Trifolium , competition was strong in sterilized soils, but these species facilitated one other in the presence of the full microbial community. The net effect of these microbes in general reduced competition while also increasing performance over that in sterilized soil, suggesting a role for soil microbial mutualists in host coexistence. Synthesis . Our results demonstrate that interactions between plants and diverse soil communities can alter plant–plant interactions and plant–soil feedbacks. They may increase niche differences and equalize fitness differences in ways consistent with observed co‐occurrence in the field.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Soil microbes increased Trifolium growth.
- Treatment
- Soil microbese0
- Interactor
- Soil microbese0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Comparator
- sterilized soile1
TrifoliumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil microbes had strong positive effects on plant growth and nodulation.”
e1“relative to competition in sterilized soil”
t0“Trifolium congeners”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil microbes increased Trifolium nodulation.
- Treatment
- Soil microbese0
- Interactor
- Soil microbese0symbiont
- Outcome
- nodulatione0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Comparator
- sterilized soile1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil microbes had strong positive effects on plant growth and nodulation.”
e1“relative to competition in sterilized soil”
t0“Trifolium congeners”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbes reduced plant competition relative to sterilized soil.
- Treatment
- Microbese0
- Interactor
- Microbese0symbiont
- Outcome
- strength of plant competitione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- competition in sterilized soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Microbes in general reduced the strength of plant competition relative to competition in sterilized soil”
t0“Trifolium congeners”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbes altered relative competition with conspecific versus congeneric neighbours in ways often predicted to enhance coexistence.
- Treatment
- Microbese1
- Interactor
- Microbese1symbiont
- Outcome
- relative strength of interactions with conspecific vs. congeneric neighbourse0
- Comparator
- competition in sterilized soile1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“altered the relative strength of interactions with conspecific vs. congeneric neighbours, which often occurred in ways predicted to enhance coexistence”
e1“Microbes in general reduced the strength of plant competition relative to competition in sterilized soil”
t0“Trifolium congeners”
Claim · model-written summary
A highly co-occurring Trifolium pair facilitated each other in full microbial communities after strong competition in sterilized soil.
- Treatment
- full microbial communitye0
- Interactor
- full microbial communitye0symbiont
- Outcome
- facilitated one othere0
- Comparator
- sterilized soilse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In one pair of highly co‐occurring Trifolium , competition was strong in sterilized soils, but these species facilitated one other in the presence of the full microbial community.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil microbes increased Trifolium performance over sterilized soil.
- Treatment
- microbese1
- Interactor
- microbese1symbiont
- Outcome
- performancee0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- sterilized soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing performance over that in sterilized soil”
e1“The net effect of these microbes in general reduced competition”
t0“Trifolium congeners”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · TrifoliumPositive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · TrifoliumResults agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.