Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Co-inoculation positively affected clover nodulation under PAH contamination.

A claim from The Response of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.) to Separate and Mixed Inoculations with Rhizobium leguminosarum and Azospirillum brasilense in Presence of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation positively affected clover nodulation under PAH contamination.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
co-inoculation of bacteria from Rhizobium and Azospirillum speciese0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
clover nodulatione0
Direction
positive effecte0
Qualifier
under the condition of PAH contaminatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation of bacteria from Rhizobium and Azospirillum species had a positive effect on clover nodulation and growth under the condition of PAH contamination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–959

Title

The Response of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.) to Separate and Mixed Inoculations with Rhizobium leguminosarum and Azospirillum brasilense in Presence of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Karolina Furtak; Karolina Gawryjołek; Anna Gałązka; et al. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020. doi:10.3390/ijerph17165751

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-9f2ba291f06fff62b7087092e9080b4d170ad78f83ae3f952413898e41ac963b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · TrifoliumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azospirillum · symbiosis · TrifoliumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · TrifoliumResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.